e-COGRAT: A Blended eHealth Intervention for Fatigue Following Acquired Brain Injury

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Fatigue; Acquired Brain Injury

• Registration Number: NCT05863897
• Lead Sponsor: Universiteit Leiden

Brief Summary

Fatigue is a common, persistent consequence of acquired brain injury (ABI). Research into treatments that may alleviate post-ABI fatigue is been limited. Pharmacological treatment (methylphenidate) has shown the greatest scientific effects, but is complicated because the risk of adverse side effects and its potential for abuse. COGRAT, an evidence-based treatment combining cognitive therapy (CO) with graded activity training (GRAT), is found to be effective in treating fatigue in patients with acquired brain injury. However, therapist guided internet-based CBT (I-CBT) could offer a more accessible and cheaper alternative to this highly frequent face to face treatment. Moreover, I-CBT is found to be effective in a population with patients with psychiatric and chronic somatic disorders, including chronic fatigue syndrome. Recent studies suggests that I-CBT is effective for people with ABI as well. To obtain optimal benefit from both group delivered face to face therapy and e-health and to combine the available evidence of COGRAT and I-CBT in patients with ABI, we developed a blended e-health cognitive behavioral (group)intervention; e-COGRAT.

The goal of this intervention study is to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of e-COGRAT to treat fatigue in people with ABI. The main questions it aims to answer are:

* Is a blended eHealth cognitive behavioral (group)intervention (e-COGRAT) effective as a treatment for fatigue in people with ABI?

* Is e-COGRAT the blended care variant of COGRAT, a cognitive behavioral group treatment for fatigue afer ABI, comparable to COGRAT in terms of efficacy?

* Will participants of e-COGRAT improve significant on overall fatigue, emotional well-being and participation?

* Will it be feasible for at least 80% of the participants to complete the intervention completely?

Detailed Description

A single case experimental design (SCED) with AB and follow-up phases across participants will be used. Within this study design, every participant will receive the blended eHealth cognitive behavioral (group)intervention (e-COGRAT). Patients who have given consent to participate in the study will be assigned to a treatment group by random assignment. Each group consists of 4 participants. Due to the group-based intervention all participants of each group will start simultaneously and immediately after baseline phase (2 weeks) with the 12-week intervention phase. Start dates will be predetermined based on the running dates of each group. The follow-up phase, immediately following after intervention phase, will take 24 weeks. The total duration of the study is 37 weeks.

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2023-04-14
• Study First Submitted QC: 2023-05-08
• Study First Posted: 2023-05-18
• Study Start: 2023-09-01
• Status Verified: 2025-03
• Last Update Submitted: 2025-03-31
• Last Update Posted: 2025-04-03
• Primary Completion: 2026-09
• Study Completion: 2026-09

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 16

Inclusion Criteria

• An ABI diagnosis (stroke and traumatic brain injury) in the chronic phase (≥6 months after injury)
• Complaints of severe fatigue (Checklist Individual Strength - subscale Fatigue score ≥ 40)
• Full comprehension of Dutch language
• Being cognitive capable of using the internet and having regular internet access.

Exclusion Criteria

• Having severe cognitive deficits (Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS) < borderline)
• Having major untreated or unstable medical or psychiatric comorbidities (eg, epilepsy, psychosis)
• Patients with (complaints of) depression are excluded if the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is > 10

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Daily fatigue	1 year (daily in baseline and intervention phase and daily in the last week of follow-up)	Primary outcome is the change in severity of fatigue complaints on a daily visual analogue scale (VAS) ("How would you rate your fatigue today?") which will be registered by text messages. Participants can indicate the severity of the experienced fatigue by given themselves a grade between 0 - 4. 0: "I'm not tired"; 1: "I'm a little bit tired"; 2: "tired"; 3: "pretty tired"; "; 4: "seriously tired". These grades will also be used in the intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Level of participation	1 year (once in baseline, treatment and follow-up)	The Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation - Participation (USER-P) is a questionnaire to rate objective and subjective participation after rehabilitation. Internal consistency is satisfactory (Cronbach's Alpha = 0.70-0.91).
Fatigue after ABI	1 year (once in baseline, treatment and follow-up)	Fatigue after ABI will be assessed with the Dutch Multifactor Fatigue Scale (DMFS). The DMFS measures 5 aspects of fatigue regarding the four weeks preceding the assessment: Impact of fatigue, Mental fatigue, Signs and Direct consequences of fatigue, Physical fatigue and Coping with fatigue. The DMFS contains 38 items. Questions are answered on a 5-point Likert scale. Subscales of the DMFS showed sufficient to good reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.70 to 0.91), good convergent validity with an existing fatigue scale, and good divergent validity with measures of mood and self-esteem.
Feasibility of the overall online intervention	1 year (once in treatment and follow-up)	Feasibility will be assessed with structured interviews about overall usability, experienced benefits and difficulties and level of involvement. These interviews, for both participants and therapists, will take place posttreatment and after follow up.
Feasibility of each specific online session	1 year (weekly during treatment and after follow-up)	After each online session both patients and therapists fill in a questionnaire with questions about their experiences with the specific session concerning usability, content, lay out, potential technical difficulties and other assorted comments.
Fatigue in the general population	1 year (once in baseline, treatment and follow-up)	Fatigue in the general population will be assessed with the Checklist Individual Strength - subscale Fatigue (CIS-f). The CIS-f contains 8 questions on fatigue severity regarding the two weeks preceding the assessment. The CIS-f has good reliability and is sensitive to change. Questions are answered on a 7-point Likert scale (1-7, higher scores represent higher fatigue).
Emotional distress	1 year (once in baseline, treatment and follow-up)	Depression and anxiety symptoms of the last week will be assessed with the Dutch version of the 14-item Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The reliability of the HADS is good (Cronbach's Alpha = 0.71 to 0.90) as is the test-retest reliability (0.86-0.90) (Spinhoven et al., 1997). Questions are answered on a 4-point Likert scale (0-3): 7 items on the depression subscale (HADS-D) and 7 items of the anxiety subscale (HADS-A). Subscale sumscores are categorized as normal (0-7), mild (8-10), moderate (11-14) or severe (15-21).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Heliomare; 🇳🇱 Wijk aan Zee, Noord Holland, Netherlands