CTRI/2019/05/019106尚未招募未知
Comparison of the New Elisar Zest Algorithm with Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm
Dr Amar Agarwal0 个研究点目标入组 0 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:
试验速览
- 阶段
- 未知
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
入排标准
入选标准
- •1.The best corrected visual acuity should be 6/6 for age <55 years and 6/9 or better for age >55 years.
- •2.Cup disc ratio less than 0.5 (intraocular difference of 0.2 mm)
- •3.IOP <21 mmHg (intraocular difference less than 3 mmHg).
排除标准
- •Fixation losses, false positive and false negative > 20% will be excluded from the study.
研究者
相似试验
尚未招募
不适用
Compare visual fields with New Elisar perimeter device with Humphrey perimeter with new software algorithmCTRI/2019/05/019204Dr Amar Agarwal
招募中
不适用
Diagnose glaucoma with portable perimeter (Elisar AVA)CTRI/2021/05/033408Elisar Life Sciences pvt Ltd
已完成
不适用
Prospective evaluation of a new algorithm for the diagnosis of malnutrition sequentially employing NRS-2002 and phase angle assessed by bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA).A prospective cohort study with outcome evaluation.Criteria for diagnosis of malnutrition, prevalence of hospital malnutritionDRKS00025307Zentrum für Klinische Studien Städtisches Klinikum Dessau1,772
招募中
Unknown
Intervention study on the diagnostic capability of SmartExamchronic liver diseaseliver diseaseJPRN-jRCT1032220574ogami Asako200
尚未招募
4 期
Comparing Two Gingival Recession Treatments Zucchellis Method with PRF versus Vestibular Tunnel Access Technique with PRFCTRI/2024/05/066929none