跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04739436
NCT04739436已完成不适用

Evaluation of Unilateral vs Bilateral Hearing Aids for the Treatment of Age-related Hearing Loss

Duke University4 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 278 人开始时间: 2021年4月26日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
278
试验地点
4
主要终点
Change in Hearing Aid Benefit as Measured by Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB)

研究概览

简要总结

This study aims to evaluate the benefit of bilateral hearing aid use compared to a unilateral hearing aid. Patients with mild to moderate bilateral hearing loss who are considering the purchase of a commercially available hearing aid will be considered for participation. Eligible participants will be randomized to one of the following treatment arms: (1) a bilateral hearing aid fitting group, and (2) a unilateral hearing aid fitting group.

详细描述

Primary objectives:

  1. To compare the hearing-aid benefit of unilateral versus bilateral fittings of commercially-available hearing aids that incorporate a dome coupling (open or closed dome as required by degree of hearing loss, or custom coupling if clinically indicated), which represents the most popular style used for mild to moderate hearing loss.
  2. To compare other multi-dimensional outcomes including hearing-related quality of life, hearing aid satisfaction in patient-nominated goals, ecological hearing aid outcomes, and hearing aid use.

Secondary objectives:

  1. To compare performance outcomes for unilateral versus bilateral hearing aid fittings
  2. To explore the differences in long-term patient reported outcomes for their final hearing aid configuration choice
  3. To explore patient experiences in each group (unilateral vs bilateral), and patient preference in regards to their choice of final hearing aid configuration.

This study is being conducted at Duke and Vanderbilt Medical Centers, with Duke functioning as the main coordinating center. Study participants will pay out of pocket for the hearing aid(s), but will be able to extend the hearing aid fitting trial period from 60 days (standard of care) to 180 days (6 months). Participants will be given the opportunity to change their hearing aid configuration and/or return their hearing aid(s) for a refund after 3 months, and again at the end of the 6 month study period.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
50 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 50+ years of age
  • Ability to read and understand English
  • Mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss (defined by a pure-tone average at 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz of <55 dB HL in each ear, and the 3000 Hz and 4000 Hz threshold <80 in each ear), based on a hearing test obtained within the last 6 months by a licensed audiologist.
  • Symmetrical hearing loss defined by <20 dB difference between the pure-tone average of 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz between ears)
  • Interested in purchasing hearing aids, but is open minded about trying one or two hearing aids
  • No prior hearing aid use longer than 3 months (as documented via self-report)
  • Adequate literacy to complete questionnaires
  • Willing to purchase study-specific hearing aid(s)
  • Access to a smart phone and the internet

排除标准

  • Concerns for middle ear pathology (e.g., air bone gap of >15 dB at 2 consecutive octave frequencies in either ear)
  • Concerns for retrocochlear pathology by audiologist (e.g unilateral tinnitus or ear fullness, referral to ENT/Auditory Brainstem Response testing to r/o acoustic neuroma)
  • Severe tinnitus as the reason for seeking amplification
  • Co-morbid condition that would interfere with study (e.g., dementia, blindness, neurologic pathology)
  • History of fluctuating hearing loss

结局指标

主要结局

Change in Hearing Aid Benefit as Measured by Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB)

时间窗: Baseline, 3 months

The APHAB score ranges from 1 to 99. The change in APHAB score was calculated as the difference between scores at 3 months and baseline, so the range of possible values for the change score is -98 to 98. A lower APHAB score indicates a better benefit; a negative change score indicates greater benefit at 3 months than at baseline.

次要结局

  • Experience With Hearing Aid Assignment as Measured by a Self-reported Questionnaire(3 months)
  • Hearing Aid Benefit, as Measured by the Measured by Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile (GHABP)(3 months)
  • Change in Hearing Aid Benefit as Measured by Bamford-Kowal-Bench Speech in Noise (BKB SIN) Test(Baseline, 3 months)
  • Change in Hearing Aid Benefit as Measured by the Abbreviated Word Auditory Recognition and Recall Measure (WARRM)(Baseline, 3 months)
  • Hearing Aid Satisfaction as Measured by Satisfaction With Amplification in Daily Life (SADL) Survey(3 months , 6 months)
  • Change in Hearing Related Quality Life as Measured by Hearing Handicap Inventory for Elderly (HHIE) Survey Completion(Baseline, 3 months, 6 months)
  • Change in Complex Ecological Listening as Measured by the Speech Spatial Qualities (SSQ) Survey(Baseline, 3 months, 6 months)
  • Hours of Hearing Aid Use(3 months)
  • Hearing Aid Expectations as Measured by the Expected Consequences of Hearing Aid Ownership (ECHO) Survey(Baseline)
  • Number of Participants in Each Arm That Chose 0, 1, or 2 Hearing Aids(3 months)
  • Change in Hearing Aid Benefit as Measured by Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB)(Baseline, 6 months)
  • Global Hearing Aid Outcomes as Measured by the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI_HA) Survey(3 months, 6 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (4)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Evaluation of Unilateral vs Bilateral Hearing Aids... | 临床试验