Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03896802
NCT03896802UnknownNot Applicable

Hemodynamic Effects of PEEP in Patients With ARDS

University of Milan2 sites in 1 country16 target enrollmentStarted: January 1, 2018Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Enrollment
16
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Cardiac Output

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of different levels of PEEP on the cardiocirculatory system in patients affected by the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)

Detailed Description

Introduction

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a clinical syndrome defined by the association of an acute onset of hypoxaemia and bilateral pulmonary infiltrates following a trigger insult; it is characterized by inflammation of the pulmonary tissue, with subsequent development of non-cardiogenic edema. The extent of edema may be such that the weight of the lung may increase up to 2-3 times its original weight. As a consequence, the lung tends to collapse on itself, more so in the dependent areas, i.e. the posterior/dorsal areas when the patient in lying supine, with the consequent development of zones of atelectasis.

These areas, when perfused, are the main cause for the development of the severe form of hypoxemia commonly seen in this condition. Hypoxemia, if severe enough, may bring by itself to the death of the patient. It has to be noted that, despite the advances in the management of critically ill patients, mortality attributable to ARDS currently is about 50%, with a range between 30-70%.

The use of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) has been reported ever since the first description of the syndrome, as a tool to manage and correct hypoxemia. PEEP has thus been used for 40 years, and is an essential part of the management of the syndrome. While the effectiveness of PEEP in improving the oxygenation of the wide part of critically ill patients with ARDS it is out of doubt, its efficacy with respect to outcomes such as mortality has not, so far, been demonstrated. The question is then still open with regards to the setting of an optimal level of PEEP in ARDS.

Frequently, ARDS is associated with the development of hemodynamic instability and shock, to the extent that up to 2/3 of patients suffering from the syndrome require the infusion of catecholamines or show signs of hypoperfusion; circulatory failure seems to be the factor more strongly associated to mortality in these patients, and the strength of the association is higher compared to that of the degree of hypoxemia. In ARDS shock is secondary to three main factors: 1) acute cor pulmonale due to pulmonary hypertension secondary to microvascular occlusion by thrombi or arteriolar remodeling and/or hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction; 2) the deleterious hemodynamic effects of mechanical ventilation, especially on right cardiac function; and 3) the possible development of septic myocardial depression.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Crossover
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Participant)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • All patients aged 18 or older and with a recent (<48h) diagnosis of ARDS, undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation and in whom, due to the hemodynamic instability, cardiac output monitoring with an Arterial pulse contour analysis and transpulmonary thermodilution system (PiCCO technology, Pulsion Medical Systems, Germany) will be considered necessary, will be considered for enrolment.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients with barotrauma and with clinical evidence of intrinsic PEEP will be excluded.

Arms & Interventions

High PEEP

Experimental

PEEP 15 cmH2O

Intervention: Physiological assesment (Procedure)

Low PEEP

Experimental

PEEP 5 cmH2O

Intervention: Physiological assesment (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Cardiac Output

Time Frame: Study 1 day

Cardiac output (in l/min) will be measured by transpulmonary thermodilution and arterial pulse contour analysis

Secondary Outcomes

  • Mean systemic filling pressure(Study 1 day)
  • Transmural central venous pressure(Study 1 day)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Davide Chiumello

Director of Intensive Care

University of Milan

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Hemodynamic Effects of PEEP in ARDS | Clinical Trial