跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04005300
NCT04005300Unknown不适用

Application of Prophylactic Low Calorie Feeding in Critically Ill Patients With High-risk Refeeding Syndrome

Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 300 人开始时间: 2019年7月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
发起方
入组人数
300
试验地点
1
主要终点
The best diagnostic criteria for refeeding syndrome

研究概览

简要总结

Critically ill patients with high-risk nutrition are often at risk of refeeding syndrome(RFS), that the incidence of RFS is as high as 30-50%. It is sure that patients with refeeding syndrome were treated with restrictive enteral nutrition, but the definition of refeeding syndrome is not uniform, and there is still a lack of awareness high-risk patients of RFS to receiving early empirical low-calorie feeding intervention. So, we designed the study which is divided into three stages. Firstly, the monitoring rate of RFS was reviewed to evaluate the incidence of RFS in general ICU. Secondly, the best diagnostic criteria of RFS were prospectively defined. Finally, on this basis, it is assessed whether early low-calorie feeding could improve prognosis in high-risk patients with RFS.

详细描述

Stage 1: the monitoring rate of re-feeding syndrome in our department was reviewed to evaluate the incidence of re-feeding syndrome in severe patients,which is not described in detail; Stage 2:This part is a prospective observational study,divided into two group,that is, RFS group(their serum phosphate concentration decreased to below 0.87 mmol/L within 72 h after starting nutritional support and the biological variation needed to be greater than 30% decrease from any concentration previously recorded), which is divided into three sub-group(Group 1 that a drop of >0.16 mmol/L from any previous measurement, to below 0.65 mmol/L within 72 h after starting nutritional support, Group 2 that their serum phosphate concentration decreased to below 0.87 mmol/L within 72 h after starting nutritional support and the biological variation needed to be greater than 30% decrease from any concentration previously recorded, and Group 3 that their serum phosphate concentration decreased to below 0•32 mmol/L within 72 h after starting nutritional support.), and nRFS group(non-RFS that the serum phosphate do not up to the criteria). And the RFS group will be receiving the low-calorie feeding intervention, the nRFS group will be receiving the standard feeding according to the ASPEN guideline of 2016.

Stage 3: On this basis of stage 2, it is assessed whether early low-calorie feeding could improve prognosis in high-risk patients with RFS who was defined in NICE(National institute for the health and care excellence).The part of stage 3, divided into two groups that standard calorie feeding group and low calorie feeding group, aims to assess whether early low-calorie feeding could improve prognosis in high-risk patients with RFS.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
Double (Participant, Care Provider)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 90 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Critically ill patients at least 18 years old;
  • No history of enteral nutrition or parenteral nutrition within 1 week before ICU admission or ICU admission within 1 week;
  • Mechanical ventilation patients requiring enteral nutrition support for >72h

排除标准

  • refuse to join this study;
  • enteral nutrition support for less than 3 days or have enteral nutrition contraindication;
  • less than 18 years old;
  • artificial nutrition (enteral/parenteral nutrition) has been applied to patients before admission;
  • other factors of hypophosphatemia: continuous hemodialysis, recent parathyroidectomy, or hyperphosphatemia after treatment;

结局指标

主要结局

The best diagnostic criteria for refeeding syndrome

时间窗: 1 month mortality and the duration of mechanical ventilation

Evaluate the best timing for intervention according to the lowest and the decline of serum phosphate

the incidence of refeeding syndrome

时间窗: 3 day after treated with nutrition

only according to serum phosphate standard

次要结局

  • duration of mechanical ventilation(30 days)
  • survival rate(28 days)
  • occurrence of complications(7 days)

研究者

发起方
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验