Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02842580
NCT02842580
Terminated
Phase 2

Randomized Phase II Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of 2 Therapeutic Strategies Combining Bevacizumab With Chemotherapy: De-escalation Versus Escalation in Patients With Non-pretreated Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive11 sites in 1 country21 target enrollmentSeptember 2016

Overview

Phase
Phase 2
Intervention
5 FLUOROURACYL
Conditions
Colorectal Neoplasms
Sponsor
Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive
Enrollment
21
Locations
11
Primary Endpoint
The Primary Objective Was the Percentage of Patients Without Failure of the Strategy 16 Months After the Randomization.
Status
Terminated
Last Updated
last year

Overview

Brief Summary

The intensity of tumour response appears to be correlated with the feasibility and the duration of a therapeutic pause or of a reduced maintenance therapy maintained until progression in patients initially controlled by so-called "induction" chemotherapy. Bevacizumab combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy (5-FU, irinotecan and/or oxaliplatin) has shown that it is possible to improve the tumour response rate and patient prognosis in 1st and 2nd lines. With a very favourable safety profile , it is an excellent candidate as induction treatment and also as maintenance treatment. Prospective data from recent trials have actually demonstrated improvement in PFS and/or overall survival with bevacizumab maintenance alone or in combination with 5FU (or capecitabine) after induction chemotherapy (FOLFIRI or FOLFOX + bevacizumab).

At the same time, the maintenance of anti-angiogenic pressure after progression in 1st line metastatic has demonstrated its benefit in terms of PFS and overall survival. Bevacizumab maintenance in 2nd line metastatic, despite progression, thus appears to be a valid strategy.

Detailed Description

Thus, the objective of this work is to combine continuous blocking of angiogenesis by bevacizumab given on the first 3 metastatic lines in a randomised phase II trial evaluating a "descending" strategy of immediate optimisation by 4 cycles of FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab and 4 cycles of FOLFIRI-bevacizumab, followed by maintenance treatment with 5FU-bevacizumab until progression (re-introduction of induction in case of progression) and evaluate an "ascending" strategy with 5FU-bevacizumab immediately followed, at progression, by the introduction of irinotecan, then oxaliplatin, with maintenance of blocking of angiogenesis by bevacizumab.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
September 2016
End Date
October 2020
Last Updated
last year
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Metastatic colorectal cancer, histologically proven (on primary tumour and/or metastases)
  • Unresectable and non-pretreated metastases
  • BRAF wild-type
  • Patient considered able to receive 3 lines of chemotherapy
  • At least one measurable target lesion \> 1 cm according to RECIST 1.1 (Appendix 4)
  • Tumour assessment according to RECIST, performed 4 weeks or less prior to randomization
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • WHO performance status ≤ 2 (Appendix 5)
  • No major surgery within 4 weeks prior to randomisation. Wound healing must be complete
  • Life expectancy greater than 3 months

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patient with a potentially resectable colorectal cancer; i.e. for whom the goal of chemotherapy would be to make all metastases resectable
  • Patients with symptomatic metastases
  • Patient with aggressive disease and a large tumour volume
  • Active gastroduodenal ulcer, wound or bone fracture
  • At least one of the following laboratory values: Neutrophils \<1500/mm3, platelets \< 100,000/mm3, haemoglobin \< 9 g/dL, total bilirubin \> 1.5 N, alkaline phosphatase \> 2.5 N (or \> 5 N in case of hepatic involvement), serum creatinine \> 1.5 N, 24 hr proteinuria \> 1 g
  • Chronic inflammatory bowel disease, extensive resection of the small bowel
  • Clinically significant coronary artery disease or a history of myocardial infraction within the last 6 months. Uncontrolled hypertension while receiving chronic medication
  • Abdominal or major extra-abdominal surgical procedure (except diagnostic biopsy) or radiation within 4 weeks before starting treatment
  • Previous treatment with an anti-angiogenic or irinotecan
  • Known or suspected central nervous system metastasis CNS metastases, or suspected CNS metastases

Arms & Interventions

Standard arm (escalation strategy - arm A)

LV5FU2 (5 FLUOROURACYL)+avastin. After progression: FOLFIRI + avastin. after the 2nd progression:FOLFOX4 (eloxatine)+ avastin.

Intervention: 5 FLUOROURACYL

Standard arm (escalation strategy - arm A)

LV5FU2 (5 FLUOROURACYL)+avastin. After progression: FOLFIRI + avastin. after the 2nd progression:FOLFOX4 (eloxatine)+ avastin.

Intervention: acide folinique

Standard arm (escalation strategy - arm A)

LV5FU2 (5 FLUOROURACYL)+avastin. After progression: FOLFIRI + avastin. after the 2nd progression:FOLFOX4 (eloxatine)+ avastin.

Intervention: irinotecan

Standard arm (escalation strategy - arm A)

LV5FU2 (5 FLUOROURACYL)+avastin. After progression: FOLFIRI + avastin. after the 2nd progression:FOLFOX4 (eloxatine)+ avastin.

Intervention: Oxaliplatin

Standard arm (escalation strategy - arm A)

LV5FU2 (5 FLUOROURACYL)+avastin. After progression: FOLFIRI + avastin. after the 2nd progression:FOLFOX4 (eloxatine)+ avastin.

Intervention: capécitabine

Standard arm (escalation strategy - arm A)

LV5FU2 (5 FLUOROURACYL)+avastin. After progression: FOLFIRI + avastin. after the 2nd progression:FOLFOX4 (eloxatine)+ avastin.

Intervention: bevacizumab

Experimental arm (de-escalation strategy -arm B)

(4 cycles of FOLFOXIRI (campto) + avastin and 4 cycles of FOLFIRI + avastin) is followed by maintenance with capecitabine

Intervention: 5 FLUOROURACYL

Experimental arm (de-escalation strategy -arm B)

(4 cycles of FOLFOXIRI (campto) + avastin and 4 cycles of FOLFIRI + avastin) is followed by maintenance with capecitabine

Intervention: acide folinique

Experimental arm (de-escalation strategy -arm B)

(4 cycles of FOLFOXIRI (campto) + avastin and 4 cycles of FOLFIRI + avastin) is followed by maintenance with capecitabine

Intervention: irinotecan

Experimental arm (de-escalation strategy -arm B)

(4 cycles of FOLFOXIRI (campto) + avastin and 4 cycles of FOLFIRI + avastin) is followed by maintenance with capecitabine

Intervention: Oxaliplatin

Experimental arm (de-escalation strategy -arm B)

(4 cycles of FOLFOXIRI (campto) + avastin and 4 cycles of FOLFIRI + avastin) is followed by maintenance with capecitabine

Intervention: capécitabine

Experimental arm (de-escalation strategy -arm B)

(4 cycles of FOLFOXIRI (campto) + avastin and 4 cycles of FOLFIRI + avastin) is followed by maintenance with capecitabine

Intervention: bevacizumab

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

The Primary Objective Was the Percentage of Patients Without Failure of the Strategy 16 Months After the Randomization.

Time Frame: 16 months after randomization

The failure of the strategy is defined by the following events: * Progression (under certain condition) using RECIST version 1.1 and defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions compared the little sum of diameters observed durin the study (NADIR), or a measurable increase in a nontarget lesion, or the appearance of new lesions * Death (all causes) * Toxicity leading to definitive stop of chemotherapy (oxaliplatine and/or irinotecan).

Secondary Outcomes

  • Best Response Rate (Using RECIST Version 1.1)(At 16 months)
  • Overall Survival (OS)(Up to 3 years after the treatment start)
  • Progression Free Survival (PFS)(up to 24 months after randomization)

Study Sites (11)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials