MedPath

Comparison of Efficacy and Ocular Surface Disease Assessment Between Monoprost and BAK-preserved Latanoprost

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Glaucoma
Ocular Hypertension
Interventions
Drug: Monoprost
Registration Number
NCT04743622
Lead Sponsor
CHA University
Brief Summary

Comparison of Efficacy and Ocular Surface Disease Assessment Between Monoprost and BAK-preserved Latanoprost in Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertensive Patients : Phase 4, Parallel Group Design, Investigator-blind, Active-control, Randomized, Multi-center Study

Detailed Description

Not provided

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
57
Inclusion Criteria
  • IOP >/= 15mmHg and < 40 mmHg in each eye using Goldmann applanation tonometry at visit 2
  • Written consent voluntarily to participate in this clinical trial
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients with closed-angle, congenital glaucoma or secondary glaucoma caused by steroid drugs, etc.
  • best-corrected visual acuity 20/80 or less
  • Patients who have ongoing medical history of ocular inflammation
  • central corneal thickness is not in between 470um and 591um.
  • Patients who have received lacrimal duct procedure within the last 3 months or who have plans to have it.
  • pregnant or nursing women

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Monoprost (preservative-free latanoprost eye drop)Monoprostlatanoprost : 1 drop once a day for 12 weeks to target eyes
Xalatan (preserved latanoprost eye drop)Xalatanlatanoprost : 1 drop once a day for 12 weeks to target eyes
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Corneal staining test(12-week-point)

The degree of staining of the cornea after blue fluorescein staining under the light of cobalt blue using a yellow filter was evaluated according to the Oxford grading system (0 to 5, the higher the worse)

Conjunctival staining test(12-week-point)

The conjunctiva was divided into 6 areas and evaluated after the same staining method according to the Oxford grading system (0 to 3, the higher the worse)

Ocular surface disease index (OSDI)(12-week-point)

The ocular surface was assessed using OSDI scoring questionnaire (0 to 100, the higher the worse)

Compliance check(12-week-point)

Compliance of the drug administration has been check through the subject's self description (0 to 100, the higher the better)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Conjunctival staining test(4-week-point)

The conjunctiva was divided into 6 areas and evaluated after the same staining method according to the Oxford grading system (0 to 3, the higher the worse)

Corneal staining test(4-week-point)

The degree of staining of the cornea after blue fluorescein staining under the light of cobalt blue using a yellow filter was evaluated according to the Oxford grading system(0 to 5, the higher the worse)

IOP (intraocular pressure)(4- / 12-week-point)

IOP was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry and measured in mmHg. (numerical)

Tear break up time (TBUT)(4- / 12-week-point)

The time taken from the last blink to the appearance of a black spot on the cornea after fluorescein dye staining. (second, numerical)

Limbal and bulbar hyperemia(4- / 12-week-point)

The conjunctival hyperemia was assessed using Efron grading scales (0 to 4, the higher the worse)

Ocular surface disease indext (OSDI)(4-week-point)

The ocular surface was assessed using OSDI scoring questionnaire(0 to 100, the higher the worse)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

CHA University Bundang Medical Center

🇰🇷

Seongnam, Bundang-gu, Korea, Republic of

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath