MedPath

A Single Arm Pilot Study to Refine a Novel Approach to Exercise Promotion Based on Affect-regulation

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Breast Cancer
Interventions
Behavioral: Core Exercise Promotion Intervention
Registration Number
NCT04903249
Lead Sponsor
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to refine the use of an affect-regulated exercise prescription for use with survivors of breast cancer.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
37
Inclusion Criteria
  • Within 5 years of completing curative treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation) for stage 0-III breast cancer
  • <60 mins/week moderate-vigorous physical activity with no major changes for the past 6-months
  • Own an Android or iPhone smartphone and willing to use the smartphone to complete app-based surveys during assessment periods
  • Willing to wear the ActiGraph monitor during assessment periods
  • Access to internet to complete REDCap survey assessments
Exclusion Criteria
  • Non-English speaking/not able to read English
  • Evidence of major contraindications for exercise (informed by the 2020 Physical Activity Readiness-Questionnaire (PAR-Q)+)
  • Currently pregnant
  • History of severe mental illness or currently taking mood stabilizing medications (antipsychotics, anticonvulsants, or lithium)
  • Evidence of moderate-severe depressive symptoms (indicated by a score ≥10 on Patient Health Questionnaire-8)
  • Evidence of moderate-severe cognitive impairment (indicated by a score < 3 on a 6-item cognitive screener)
  • Evidence of clinically significant substance use as indicated by a score of ≥2 on the CAGE-AID screener

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Affect-regulated exercise prescriptionCore Exercise Promotion InterventionParticipants receive instructions to adjust their pace of exercise so that they feel "fairly good" or better (i.e., a rating of +1 or higher on the Feeling Scale) while exercising and to avoid any increases in intensity that promote feeling "fairly bad" or worse. If no intensity of exercise feels at least "fairly good" participants will be told to exercise at an intensity that feels "as positive as possible."
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Acceptability of the Affect-regulated Exercise Prescription Measured Using the Treatment Acceptability and Preferences (TAP) Measure12-weeks follow-up assessment

A 4-item self-report questionnaire used to measure acceptability of the affect-regulated exercise prescription using a Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Total scores range from 0 - 16. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability.

Percentage of Sample With Valid Accelerometer Data at 6-weeks Follow-up6-weeks follow-up assessment

The number of participants with valid accelerometer data out of the total number of participants in the sample during the 6-week follow-up assessment, multiplied by 100%.

Percentage of Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) Survey Prompt CompletionBaseline through 12-weeks follow-up assessments

The percentage of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) survey prompts completed by participants during the study out of the total number of EMA survey prompts delivered to participants.

Percentage of Sample With Valid Accelerometer Data at 2-weeks Follow-up2-weeks follow-up assessment

The number of participants with valid accelerometer data out of the total number of participants in the sample during the 2-week follow-up assessment, multiplied by 100%.

Percentage of Sample With Valid Accelerometer Data at 12-weeks Follow-up12-weeks follow-up assessment

The number of participants with valid accelerometer data out of the total number of participants in the sample during the 12-week follow-up assessment, multiplied by 100%.

Percentage of Sample With Valid Accelerometer Data at BaselineBaseline assessment

The number of participants with valid accelerometer data out of the total number of participants in the sample at baseline, multiplied by 100%.

Number of Participants Who Completed the Exit Interview12-weeks follow-up assessment

Semi-structured interview to assess participants' perceptions regarding their experience participating in the study.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Satisfaction With Study Participation as Measured by the Participant Satisfaction Questionnaire12-weeks follow-up assessment

An 8-item self-report questionnaire used to assess participant satisfaction with study participation using a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 4 . Scores are summed and then averaged; total scores range from 1- 4. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.

Study Retention at 12-weeks Follow-up12-weeks follow-up assessment

Number of participants who complete the 12-week follow-up assessment out of the number of participants who enroll in the study.

Average Minutes of Daily Moderate-vigorous Physical Activity Measured Using the ActiGraph wGT3X-BT Accelerometer at 12 Weeks Follow-up12-weeks follow-up assessment

The research grade ActiGraph wGT3X-BT model is a valid measure of physical activity intensity and duration among multiple populations, including breast cancer survivors. Minutes of moderate-vigorous physical activity will be collected from the ActiGraph wGT3X-BT every day for 10-days. Average minutes of moderate-vigorous physical activity completed per day of valid wear time will be calculated.

Study Retention at 2-weeks Follow-up2-weeks follow-up assessment

Number of participants who complete the 2-week follow-up assessment out of the number of participants who enroll in the study.

Study Retention at 6-weeks Follow-up6-weeks follow-up assessment

Number of participants who complete the 6-week follow-up assessment out of the number of participants who enroll in the study.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic

🇺🇸

Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath