Clinical Efficacy of Supraclavicular Block for Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery
- Conditions
- Horner's Syndrome
- Interventions
- Other: Supraclavicular blockOther: Interscalene block
- Registration Number
- NCT01958801
- Lead Sponsor
- Daegu Catholic University Medical Center
- Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of supraclavicular and interscalene brachial plexus blocks in the patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery.
- Detailed Description
This study aims to compare supraclavicular brachial plexus block to interscalene brachial plexus block with regard to degree of sensory and motor blockades, side effects and complications of the blocks, and frequency of intraoperative analgesics or antihypertensives use.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 104
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II
- Body mass index < 35 kg/m2
- Neurologic deficits on the side to be blocked
- Infection or inflammation at the puncture site for brachial plexus block
- Psychiatric disorders
- Patient refusal
- Difficulty to communicate
- Coagulation deficiencies
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Supraclavicular block Supraclavicular block Supraclavicular block is performed under ultrasound guidance. Linear probe is placed on the ipsilateral supraclavicular fossa visualizing the brachial plexus located lateral to the subclavian artery. Using in-plane technique, nerve stimulation needle is advanced into the brachial plexus sheath, into which 25 ml of 1.5% mepivacaine is injected. Interscalene block Interscalene block Interscalene block is performed under ultrasound guidance. Linear probe is placed on the ipsilateral interscalene groove visualizing the brachial plexus located between anterior and middle scalene muscles. Using in-plane technique, nerve stimulation needle is advanced into the brachial plexus sheath, into which 25 ml of 1.5% mepivacaine is injected.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Degree of sensory blockade 20 minutes after the end of local anesthetics injection Sensory blockade of the C5 to T1 dermatomes was assessed by rating the absence of cold sensation between 100 (intact sensation) and 0 (no sensation) with an alcohol swab.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Side effects 20 minutes after the end of local anethetics injection Horner's syndrome (ptosis, miosis, anhidrosis) Subjective dyspnea Hoarseness
Frequency of intraoperative analgesics or antihypertensives use At the end of the surgery Frequency of intraoperative use of opioids (fentanyl) or antihypertensives (hydralazine)
Degree of motor blockade 20 minutes after the end of local anethetics injection Motor blockade was evaluated by elbow and wrist extension (radial nerve), finger abduction (ulnar nerve), wrist flexion (median nerve), and elbow flexion (musculocutaneous nerve). The muscle force was rated on a scale of 0 to 6 as follows (6: normal muscle force; 5: slightly reduced muscle force; 4: greatly reduced muscle force; 3: slightly impaired mobility; 2: greatly impaired mobility; 1: near complete paralysis; 0: complete paralysis).
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Daegu Catholic University Medical Center
🇰🇷Daegu, Korea, Republic of