C24H29NO3
120014-06-4
Alzheimer's Disease (AD), Dementia With Lewy Body Disease, Dementia due to Parkinson's disease, Dementia of the Alzheimer's Type, Vascular Dementia (VaD), Moderate Alzheimer's Type Dementia, Severe Alzheimer's Type Dementia
Donepezil is a centrally acting, reversible inhibitor of the enzyme acetylcholinesterase (AChE).[1] It represents a second generation of AChE inhibitors, developed for the palliative treatment of dementia associated with Alzheimer's disease following the clinical and safety challenges encountered with first-generation agents like tacrine.[2] Marketed principally under the brand name Aricept®, among others, donepezil has become a cornerstone in the symptomatic management of Alzheimer's disease across its full spectrum, from mild to severe stages.[1] Its development by Eisai, beginning in 1983, culminated in its initial approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1996, and it has since become one of the most widely prescribed medications for this condition globally.[1]
The primary therapeutic utility of donepezil lies in its ability to produce a modest, symptomatic improvement in cognitive function, including memory and attention, as well as in the patient's capacity to perform activities of daily living.[1] By enhancing cholinergic neurotransmission in the brain, it can help manage behavioral symptoms such as apathy, confusion, and aggression that are common in dementia.[5] However, a crucial and consistently reported finding is that donepezil does not alter the underlying pathophysiology or slow the inexorable progression of Alzheimer's disease.[1] The benefits observed in clinical trials are symptomatic and transient, abating within weeks of treatment discontinuation.[7] This distinction between symptomatic relief and disease modification is fundamental to understanding donepezil's place in therapy. It serves as a palliative agent that can temporarily improve quality of life but is not a cure or a disease-modifying treatment. This reality underscores the significant unmet need for therapies that can target the root causes of neurodegeneration.
Donepezil is available in a variety of formulations designed to address different clinical needs and patient populations. The original oral tablets are marketed as Aricept®.[1] To accommodate patients with difficulty swallowing (dysphagia), an orally disintegrating tablet,
Aricept Evess®, was developed.[8] More recently, a once-weekly transdermal patch,
Adlarity®, was introduced to improve patient adherence and potentially reduce gastrointestinal side effects by bypassing oral administration.[9] Furthermore, a fixed-dose combination capsule,
Namzaric®, which combines donepezil with another Alzheimer's medication, memantine, is available to simplify treatment regimens for patients with moderate-to-severe disease.[5] Following the expiration of its primary patent in 2010, donepezil became widely available as a generic medication, which significantly altered its market landscape while solidifying its position as a first-line symptomatic therapy.[1]
Donepezil is a small molecule drug belonging to the piperidine class of compounds.[13] To ensure unambiguous identification, a comprehensive list of its chemical names, registry numbers, and database identifiers is provided in Table 2.1. These identifiers are essential for cross-referencing information across chemical, pharmacological, and clinical databases.
Table 2.1: Chemical and Database Identifiers for Donepezil
Identifier Type | Value | Source(s) |
---|---|---|
Drug Name | Donepezil | 1 |
DrugBank ID | DB00843 | 1 |
CAS Number | 120014-06-4 | 1 |
IUPAC Name | (RS)-2--5,6-dimethoxy-2,3-dihydroinden-1-one | 1 |
Synonyms | Aricept, E2020, Adlarity, Eranz | 5 |
PubChem CID | 3152 | 1 |
ChEMBL ID | CHEMBL502 | 1 |
ChEBI ID | CHEBI:53289 | 1 |
UNII | 8SSC91326P | 1 |
KEGG ID | D07869 | 1 |
InChI | InChI=1S/C24H29NO3/c1-27-22-14-19-13-20(24(26)21(19)15-23(22)28-2)12-17-8-10-25(11-9-17)16-18-6-4-3-5-7-18/h3-7,14-15,17,20H,8-13,16H2,1-2H3 | 13 |
InChIKey | ADEBPBSSDYVVLD-UHFFFAOYSA-N | 13 |
SMILES | COC1=C(C=C2C(=C1)CC(C2=O)CC3CCN(CC3)CC4=CC=CC=C4)OC | 1 |
Donepezil has the molecular formula C24H29NO3 and a molar mass of approximately 379.500 g·mol⁻¹.[1] Structurally, it is composed of a dimethoxy-indanone moiety linked via a methylene bridge to a piperidine ring, which is in turn N-substituted with a benzyl group.[13]
A critical feature of its structure is the presence of a single stereocenter at the C2 position of the indanone ring. As commercially formulated, donepezil is a racemic mixture, containing equimolar amounts of the (R)- and (S)-enantiomers.[13] This means that patients are administered both stereoisomers, although research into the specific activities of each has been conducted.[15]
The physicochemical characteristics of donepezil are central to its formulation, absorption, distribution, and overall pharmacokinetic profile.
The pharmacological effects of donepezil are complex, stemming from a primary, well-defined mechanism of action supplemented by several secondary or non-cholinergic pathways that are subjects of ongoing research.
The principal mechanism of action of donepezil is its function as a potent, selective, and reversible inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase (AChE).[1] The cholinergic hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease posits that cognitive decline is partly due to a deficiency in cholinergic neurotransmission in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus.[5] AChE is the enzyme responsible for the rapid hydrolysis of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine (ACh) in the synaptic cleft, terminating its signal. By inhibiting AChE, donepezil reduces the breakdown of ACh, thereby increasing its concentration and duration of action at cholinergic synapses.[5] This enhancement of cholinergic function is believed to be the basis for the symptomatic improvements in cognition and behavior observed in patients.[5]
Donepezil is a non-competitive inhibitor, binding reversibly to the peripheral anionic site of the AChE enzyme, which is distinct from the catalytic active site where ACh binds.[20] This interaction induces a conformational change that impedes substrate access to the active site.
A defining feature of donepezil is its high selectivity for AChE over butyrylcholinesterase (BChE), another cholinesterase found in plasma and various tissues, including the brain.[16] In vitro studies demonstrate a half-maximal inhibitory concentration (
IC50) for AChE of approximately 6.7 nM, whereas its IC50 for BChE is around 988 nM.[16] This represents a selectivity ratio of over 100-fold in favor of AChE. This high selectivity is clinically relevant, as inhibition of BChE is thought to contribute to some of the undesirable peripheral side effects of less selective cholinesterase inhibitors.
Growing evidence suggests that the therapeutic profile of donepezil may not be solely attributable to AChE inhibition. Several non-cholinergic mechanisms have been proposed that may contribute to its effects and open avenues for its use in other diseases. This emerging understanding challenges the paradigm of donepezil as a pure AChE inhibitor, suggesting it may be a more pleiotropic agent than initially recognized.
The pharmacokinetic profile of donepezil is characterized by complete oral absorption, extensive distribution (including into the CNS), metabolism by the cytochrome P450 system, and a very long elimination half-life. These properties dictate its dosing regimen and potential for drug interactions. Key parameters are summarized in Table 3.1.
Table 3.1: Key Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Donepezil
Parameter | Value (with units) | Dosing Condition | Population | Source(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bioavailability | 100% | Oral | Healthy Adults | 5 |
Time to Peak (Tmax) | 3 - 4 hours | Oral | Healthy Adults | 1 |
Peak Concentration (Cmax) | 34.1 ng/mL | 5 mg once daily, steady-state | Homo sapiens | 14 |
60.5 ng/mL | 10 mg once daily, steady-state | Homo sapiens | 14 | |
Area Under Curve (AUC) | 2889.3 ng·h/mL | 5 mg once daily, steady-state | Homo sapiens | 14 |
5051.9 ng·h/mL | 10 mg once daily, steady-state | Homo sapiens | 14 | |
Volume of Distribution (Vd) | 12 - 16 L/kg | Steady-state | Healthy Adults | 5 |
Plasma Protein Binding | 96% | N/A | Homo sapiens | 1 |
Elimination Half-Life (t1/2) | ~70 hours (up to 100h in elderly) | Oral | Healthy/Elderly | 1 |
Clearance | 0.11 - 0.13 L/h/kg | Oral | Healthy Adults | 1 |
Following oral administration, donepezil is slowly but completely absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract, with a relative bioavailability of 100%.[5] Peak plasma concentrations (
Tmax) are achieved in approximately 3 to 4 hours.[1] Due to its very long elimination half-life, steady-state plasma concentrations are not reached until 15 to 21 days of consistent daily dosing.[1] This extended time to reach steady state is a critical factor influencing the recommended titration schedule. The development of the Adlarity® transdermal patch was specifically aimed at providing a more consistent, continuous delivery of the drug over a week, thereby avoiding the peaks and troughs of oral dosing and bypassing gastrointestinal absorption, which may reduce the incidence of GI-related side effects.[10]
Donepezil has a large apparent volume of distribution at steady-state, ranging from 12 to 16 L/kg.[5] This indicates that the drug is extensively distributed into tissues outside of the vascular compartment. As previously noted, its high lipophilicity allows it to readily cross the blood-brain barrier and achieve therapeutic concentrations in the CNS, with cerebrospinal fluid concentrations measured at 15.7% of plasma levels.[5] Donepezil is highly bound to plasma proteins (approximately 96%), primarily to albumin (~75%) and, to a lesser extent, to alpha-1-acid glycoprotein (~21%).[1]
Donepezil is extensively metabolized in the liver prior to excretion.[20] The primary metabolic pathways are mediated by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes, specifically
CYP2D6 and CYP3A4, with a minor contribution from CYP1A2.[1] The drug undergoes a series of biotransformation reactions, including O-dealkylation, hydroxylation, N-oxidation, hydrolysis, and subsequent O-glucuronidation to form more polar metabolites.[5] Four major metabolites have been identified, two of which are pharmacologically active.[1] The most significant of these is
6-O-desmethyl donepezil, which has been shown to inhibit AChE with a potency similar to that of the parent compound.[5]
The elimination of donepezil and its metabolites occurs primarily through the kidneys. In a study with radiolabeled donepezil, approximately 57% of the administered dose was recovered in the urine and 15% in the feces over a 10-day period.[5] A significant portion of the drug, about 17%, is excreted as unchanged donepezil in the urine.[1] The elimination half-life (
t1/2) is notably long, averaging around 70 hours in healthy young adults, and can extend to 100 hours or more in elderly patients.[1] This long half-life is a double-edged sword: it allows for the convenience of once-daily dosing, which can improve patient adherence, but it also means that the drug takes a long time to be cleared from the body. Consequently, if a patient experiences significant adverse effects, it may take several weeks for the drug to wash out completely. This pharmacokinetic property is the direct reason for the slow dose titration schedules recommended in clinical practice.
Donepezil is indicated for the treatment of dementia of the Alzheimer's type, with efficacy demonstrated in patients with mild, moderate, and severe disease.[7]
The efficacy of donepezil in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease was established in two pivotal, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials.[7] These studies evaluated daily doses of 5 mg and 10 mg. Efficacy was measured using a dual-outcome strategy: the cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-cog) to measure cognitive performance, and the Clinician’s Interview-Based Impression of Change with caregiver input (CIBIC-plus) to assess overall global function.[7]
In both studies, patients treated with either 5 mg/day or 10 mg/day of donepezil showed a statistically significant improvement in cognitive function compared to those receiving placebo. The mean difference in ADAS-cog score change from baseline was approximately 2.7 to 3.1 points in favor of donepezil.[7] While these results were statistically robust, the magnitude of the benefit is considered modest. An important finding from these trials was that the 10 mg dose did not provide a statistically significantly greater clinical benefit than the 5 mg dose on the primary endpoints.[7] However, dose-trend analyses suggested that some patients might derive additional benefit from the higher dose. This led to the official recommendation that the choice between the 5 mg and 10 mg dose is a matter of "prescriber and patient preference".[7]
The indication for donepezil was later expanded to include moderate-to-severe disease based on further clinical trials.[1] Studies using the 10 mg/day dose demonstrated statistically significant superiority over placebo on measures appropriate for a more severely impaired population, such as the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB) for cognition and the modified Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-ADL-severe) for function.[7]
The approval of a higher, 23 mg tablet was more controversial. This approval was based on a single, large head-to-head study (Study 326) comparing the 23 mg/day dose to the standard 10 mg/day dose in patients with moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's.[7] The study met one of its two co-primary endpoints: patients on the 23 mg dose showed a statistically significant, though small, additional improvement in cognition as measured by the SIB (a mean difference of 2.2 points).[7] However, the study
failed to demonstrate a statistically significant benefit for the 23 mg dose on the other co-primary endpoint of overall global function, as measured by the CIBIC-plus.[23] This mixed result, coupled with a higher rate of adverse events for the 23 mg dose, led to significant debate, which is explored further in Section 7.
Beyond its approved indication, donepezil has been investigated for a wide range of other neurological and psychiatric conditions, reflecting interest in its potential effects on cognition and behavior across different pathologies.
There is evidence, though often not definitive, suggesting potential benefits of donepezil in other forms of dementia:
The use of donepezil for Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), a transitional state between normal aging and dementia, is a critical area of off-label use and a significant case study in pharmacogenetics. Donepezil was evaluated for this indication in a large, federally funded clinical trial published in 2005, but it failed to show sufficient efficacy and was not approved by the FDA for treating MCI.[26]
Despite the lack of approval, the practice of prescribing donepezil off-label for MCI became common, likely based on an extrapolation of its benefits in early Alzheimer's disease.[26] This practice, however, was cast in a new and alarming light by subsequent research. A re-analysis of the 2005 trial data, published in 2017, uncovered a critical pharmacogenetic interaction. The study revealed that MCI patients who carry a specific genetic variation—the
K-variant of the butyrylcholinesterase gene (BChE-K)—experienced accelerated cognitive decline when treated with donepezil compared to those who received a placebo.[26] For this genetic subpopulation, the drug was not merely ineffective; it was actively harmful. This finding fundamentally alters the risk-benefit assessment for off-label donepezil use in MCI. It transforms the issue from a simple lack of efficacy to a serious safety concern for a genetically defined group of patients, highlighting the profound importance of personalized medicine and the potential dangers of prescribing without a complete evidence base.
Donepezil has been studied in numerous other conditions with varying degrees of success:
The discovery of donepezil's pleiotropic effects beyond AChE inhibition has spurred research into novel therapeutic areas:
The safety profile of donepezil is well-characterized and is predominantly a direct extension of its primary pharmacological action: the enhancement of cholinergic activity throughout the central and peripheral nervous systems.
Interactions with donepezil can be pharmacodynamic (related to its cholinergic effects) or pharmacokinetic (related to its metabolism).
An overdose of donepezil can result in a cholinergic crisis, a medical emergency characterized by the signs and symptoms of excessive cholinergic stimulation. These include severe nausea and vomiting, salivation, sweating, bradycardia, hypotension, respiratory depression, muscular weakness, collapse, and convulsions.[5] Severe muscle weakness affecting the respiratory muscles can be fatal. Management is primarily supportive. The use of tertiary anticholinergics, such as
intravenous atropine, serves as an antidote. Atropine should be titrated based on the clinical response to reverse the muscarinic effects of the overdose.[5]
The development of multiple donepezil formulations reflects a combination of clinical need—addressing challenges like swallowing difficulties and side effects—and strategic pharmaceutical lifecycle management aimed at extending market presence.
Donepezil is available in several distinct formulations:
The dosing of donepezil must be initiated at a low dose and titrated slowly to improve tolerability and minimize cholinergic side effects.
Each alternative formulation of donepezil was developed to address specific clinical or practical challenges:
The history of donepezil is a compelling narrative of successful drug development, market dominance, and strategic lifecycle management. It also includes a notable regulatory controversy that offers important lessons on the interplay between clinical evidence, regulatory standards, and commercial interests.
The regulatory journey of donepezil in the United States has been marked by a series of strategic approvals that expanded its indications and introduced new formulations to maintain its market position.
Table 7.1: Timeline of Key FDA Approvals for Donepezil Formulations
Date | Product/Formulation | Company | Key Action/Indication | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 1996 | Aricept® (oral tablets) | Eisai / Pfizer | Initial approval for mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (5 mg, 10 mg). | Established donepezil as a primary treatment for Alzheimer's dementia.1 |
Oct 2004 | Aricept ODT® (orally disintegrating tablets) | Eisai | Approval of a new formulation for patients with dysphagia. | Addressed a key clinical need and expanded the product line.31 |
2006 | Aricept® (oral tablets) | Eisai / Pfizer | Indication expanded to include severe Alzheimer's disease. | Broadened the approved patient population to cover all stages of the disease.1 |
Jul 2010 | Aricept® 23 mg (oral tablet) | Eisai / Pfizer | Approval of a new, higher dose for moderate-to-severe disease. | Controversial approval just before the patent expiry of the 10 mg dose.12 |
Nov 2010 | Generic Donepezil | Various | First generic versions of 5 mg and 10 mg tablets approved. | Marked the end of market exclusivity for the original formulation, leading to price competition.1 |
Dec 2014 | Namzaric® (combination capsule) | Actavis / Adamas | Approval of a fixed-dose combination of donepezil and memantine ER. | A lifecycle management strategy to offer a new, branded product for dual therapy.11 |
Mar 2022 | Adlarity® (transdermal system) | Corium, Inc. | Approval of a once-weekly patch delivering 5 mg/day or 10 mg/day. | Offered a novel delivery system to improve adherence and tolerability, another key lifecycle extension.6 |
The FDA's approval of the 23 mg dose of donepezil in July 2010 is a significant and contentious event in the drug's history. This approval serves as a case study on the complexities of drug regulation, particularly the distinction between statistical significance and clinical meaningfulness.
The approval was granted just four months before the patent on the widely used 10 mg dose was set to expire, a timing that was highly advantageous for the manufacturer as it provided a new, patent-protected product to market.[12] The regulatory decision was based on a single pivotal trial (Study 326) that compared the new 23 mg dose head-to-head with the standard 10 mg dose.[23] The study's results were ambiguous: it showed a small, statistically significant benefit for the 23 mg dose on one of its two co-primary endpoints (cognition, as measured by the SIB), but it
failed to meet its other co-primary endpoint related to overall clinical impression of change (global function, as measured by the CIBIC+).[23]
Most critically, publicly available documents revealed that both the FDA's own medical and statistical reviewers had recommended against approving the 23 mg dose. Their rationale was that the drug had not met the pre-specified criteria for demonstrating a clinically meaningful benefit, especially when weighed against the fact that the 23 mg dose was associated with a significantly higher incidence of adverse events, including nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea.[12] The agency's decision to grant approval despite these strong internal objections from its own scientific experts raised serious questions about the standards for approval and the potential influence of non-clinical factors in the regulatory process. This episode demonstrates that an "FDA-approved" label does not always signify a clear or substantial clinical advantage over existing therapies.
Prior to its patent expiration, Aricept® was a commercial blockbuster, achieving annual sales of over $2 billion in the United States alone.[12] It was the world's best-selling treatment for Alzheimer's disease.[1] The loss of patent protection in November 2010 and the subsequent entry of low-cost generic versions dramatically changed the market dynamics.[1]
The subsequent launches of the patent-protected 23 mg tablet, the Namzaric® combination product, and the Adlarity® transdermal patch are clear examples of product lifecycle management. This is a common pharmaceutical industry strategy wherein new formulations, dosages, or combinations of an existing drug are developed to create new, patent-protected products. These new products can then be marketed as offering advantages over the now-generic original, thereby extending the brand's commercial life and revenue stream. This history illustrates that the evolution of a drug's available forms is driven by a complex interplay of genuine clinical innovation and powerful commercial incentives.
Donepezil has firmly established itself as a foundational therapy in the pharmacopeia for Alzheimer's disease. For over two decades, it has served as a valuable and widely used tool for the symptomatic management of the cognitive, functional, and behavioral disturbances associated with the condition. Its relatively straightforward once-daily oral dosing, coupled with a well-understood and generally manageable safety profile, has cemented its status as a first-line agent.
However, a nuanced assessment requires acknowledging its profound limitations. The clinical benefits afforded by donepezil are, by all objective measures, modest, transient, and not experienced by all patients. Most importantly, it has no effect whatsoever on the underlying neurodegenerative cascade that drives Alzheimer's disease. It does not slow, halt, or reverse the pathological processes in the brain. In this context, donepezil's legacy is that of a palliative bridge—a therapy that can provide temporary relief and improve quality of life for a period, but not a destination. Its history is a microcosm of the broader story of Alzheimer's drug development in the late 20th and early 21st centuries: a field long dominated by a focus on symptomatic relief in the frustrating absence of true disease-modifying agents.
The future of donepezil is likely to evolve in two key directions: optimizing its use through personalization and exploring its potential in new therapeutic areas.
Ultimately, while donepezil will likely remain a relevant symptomatic therapy for the foreseeable future, its limitations serve as a constant and urgent reminder of the need to look beyond. The global scientific and medical communities remain focused on the paramount goal: the development of true disease-modifying therapies that can fundamentally alter the course of Alzheimer's disease and other devastating dementias.
Published at: July 15, 2025
This report is continuously updated as new research emerges.
Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.
© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.