C19H24N2
50-49-7
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Bulimia Nervosa, Depression, Enuresis, Neuropathic Pain, Panic Disorder
Imipramine stands as a landmark compound in the history of psychopharmacology, representing the prototypical agent of the tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) class.[1] As a dibenzazepine derivative, its introduction into clinical practice fundamentally altered the therapeutic landscape for major depressive disorder, ushering in the first generation of effective pharmacological treatments for mood disorders.[1] Although its clinical use has become more circumscribed in the modern era of more selective and better-tolerated agents, Imipramine retains significant clinical relevance for specific indications, including treatment-resistant depression and childhood enuresis, and its study continues to yield critical insights into the neurobiology of mood and the mechanisms of antidepressant action.[1]
The discovery of Imipramine's antidepressant properties was not the result of targeted drug design but rather a product of serendipity and astute clinical observation, a common theme in the golden age of psychopharmacology. The compound was first synthesized in 1951 by the pharmaceutical company Geigy (later part of Ciba-Geigy) in Switzerland during a research program aimed at developing novel antihistamines.[5] Following the groundbreaking discovery of chlorpromazine's antipsychotic effects in 1952, pharmaceutical research shifted to explore structurally similar molecules for similar activities. Due to its tricyclic structure, which bears a resemblance to the phenothiazine core of chlorpromazine, Imipramine (then designated G22355) was subsequently investigated as a potential antipsychotic agent for patients with schizophrenia.[3] This developmental lineage helps to explain its broad, multi-receptor pharmacological profile.
This origin story is a powerful illustration of a major discovery paradigm in medical history. The intended therapeutic target, histamine receptors, and the subsequent investigational target, dopamine receptors for psychosis, were ultimately incorrect. The drug's true clinical value lay in an entirely unexpected effect on mood. This journey from antihistamine to failed antipsychotic to revolutionary antidepressant highlights the critical role of open-minded, investigator-initiated, and observation-driven clinical research in uncovering novel therapeutic applications that rational design alone might miss.
The pivotal moment in Imipramine's history came from the work of Swiss psychiatrist Dr. Roland Kuhn at the Münsterlingen psychiatric hospital. Between 1955 and 1956, while conducting clinical trials with G22355, Kuhn observed that the compound was ineffective at treating the psychotic symptoms of schizophrenia. However, he astutely noted a remarkable and consistent mood-elevating effect in a subset of his patients suffering from what was then termed "vital" or endogenous depression, characterized by psychomotor retardation and pervasive anhedonia.[8] In 1957, Kuhn published his landmark findings on an initial cohort of 40 patients in the
Swiss Medical Weekly, presenting the first documented evidence of a drug with specific antidepressant action.[8] This report, born from meticulous clinical observation in a remote hospital setting, effectively announced the discovery of the first modern antidepressant drug.[9]
The sequence of these events reveals a profound relationship between clinical discovery and neurobiological theory. Kuhn's initial report described a clear clinical effect without a known mechanism of action; he himself admitted he did not understand how the drug worked.[8] It was only after its efficacy was established that subsequent research elucidated its primary mechanism as the inhibition of serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake.[1] This led researchers to reason backward from effect to cause: if a drug that increases the availability of brain monoamines alleviates depression, then depression must be caused by a deficiency of these monoamines. This line of reasoning gave birth to the monoamine hypothesis of depression, a theory that would dominate psychiatric research and drug development for the next half-century.[2] Thus, a single, serendipitous clinical observation not only introduced a new class of medication but also provided the foundational evidence for the dominant neurobiological theory of a major psychiatric illness for decades to come.
Following Kuhn's discovery, Imipramine was introduced for medical use in 1957 under the brand name Tofranil and received its landmark approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1959, officially becoming the first TCA to be marketed.[3] This event established the tricyclic antidepressants as the standard of care for depression for nearly three decades and solidified the monoamine hypothesis as the leading paradigm in the field. The discovery and development of Imipramine paved the way for an entire class of related drugs and spurred decades of research into the neurochemical underpinnings of mood disorders, a legacy that continues to influence psychopharmacology today.
A comprehensive understanding of Imipramine's clinical pharmacology begins with its fundamental chemical and physical characteristics.
The compound is identified through a variety of international and chemical naming systems:
Imipramine is a dibenzazepine, a chemical class defined by its characteristic three-ring structure. This tricyclic system consists of a central seven-membered azepine ring fused to two flanking benzene rings.[1] Its structure is noted to be similar to that of phenothiazines, differing primarily in the bridge connecting the two benzene rings (an ethylene bridge in Imipramine versus a sulfur atom in phenothiazines), which explains its initial investigation as an antipsychotic.[1]
Pharmacologically, Imipramine is classified as a tertiary amine TCA due to the presence of two methyl groups on the terminal nitrogen atom of its alkyl amine side chain (N,N-dimethyl). This structural feature is not merely a chemical classification but a key determinant of its entire pharmacological profile. The presence of the N,N-dimethyl group is causally linked to its higher affinity for the serotonin transporter (SERT) compared to its secondary amine metabolite, desipramine.[3] Furthermore, this tertiary amine structure contributes significantly to its potent antagonism at "off-target" receptors, including muscarinic, histaminic, and alpha-1 adrenergic receptors.[2] Therefore, this single structural feature is the root of Imipramine's dual nature: it drives its broad-spectrum efficacy while simultaneously being responsible for its challenging side-effect burden.
The hydrochloride salt of Imipramine, the form used in pharmaceutical preparations, is a white to off-white, odorless, or practically odorless crystalline powder.[17] Its solubility profile is a key determinant of its formulation and absorption characteristics. It is freely soluble in water and alcohol, soluble in acetone, but is insoluble in nonpolar solvents like ether and benzene.[17] Quantitative data show high solubility in water (
62.8 mg/mL) and DMSO (62.7 mg/mL) but lower solubility in phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.2) at 0.5 mg/mL.[15]
The manufacturing process for Imipramine involves the alkylation of the starting material, 10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenz[b,f]azepine (also known as iminodibenzyl). In this reaction, iminodibenzyl is treated with a strong base, such as sodium amide (NaNH2), in an anhydrous benzene solvent to deprotonate the nitrogen atom. Subsequently, 3-dimethylaminopropyl chloride is added to the reaction mixture, which alkylates the nitrogen atom to form the Imipramine free base. The final product is then isolated through a process of washing, acid-base extraction, and high-vacuum distillation. The hydrochloride salt is prepared by treating the purified base with alcoholic hydrochloric acid.[5]
Table 1: Summary of Imipramine's Physicochemical Properties | |
---|---|
Property | Value / Description |
Generic Name | Imipramine 1 |
DrugBank ID | DB00458 1 |
Chemical Class | Dibenzazepine; Tertiary Amine Tricyclic Antidepressant 1 |
IUPAC Name | 5-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenz[b,f]azepine 1 |
CAS Number | 50-49-7 (Free Base) 5; 113-52-0 (HCl Salt) 15 |
Molecular Formula | C19H24N2 (Free Base) 13; |
Molecular Weight | 280.41 g/mol (Free Base) 5; |
Appearance | White to off-white, odorless crystalline powder (HCl Salt) 17 |
Melting Point | 174−175 °C (HCl Salt) 5 |
pKa | 9.66 6 |
Solubility (HCl Salt) | Freely soluble in water and alcohol; insoluble in ether and benzene 17 |
XLogP | 4.03 20 |
Topological Polar Surface Area | 6.48 A˚2 20 |
The clinical effects of Imipramine are a direct result of its interactions with multiple molecular targets within the central nervous system. Its profile is characterized by a primary mechanism responsible for its therapeutic antidepressant effects and a broad array of secondary receptor interactions that account for its extensive side-effect profile.
The central therapeutic effect of Imipramine is attributed to its ability to potentiate serotonergic and adrenergic neurotransmission.[17] It achieves this by acting as a potent inhibitor of the neuronal reuptake of the neurotransmitters serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE).[1] Imipramine binds to and blocks the function of the sodium-dependent serotonin transporter (SERT) and the sodium-dependent norepinephrine transporter (NET).[1] These transporters are located on the presynaptic neuron and are responsible for clearing neurotransmitters from the synaptic cleft, thereby terminating their signal. By inhibiting these transporters, Imipramine increases the concentration and prolongs the residence time of 5-HT and NE in the synapse, enhancing their ability to stimulate postsynaptic receptors.[1] This sustained increase in monoaminergic signaling is thought to trigger a cascade of downstream intracellular events, including changes in protein kinase signaling and gene expression, which ultimately lead to neuroadaptive changes that relieve the symptoms of depression.[1]
A crucial aspect of its pharmacology is the differential affinity of the parent drug and its primary metabolite. Imipramine, as a tertiary amine, exhibits a significantly higher affinity for SERT than for NET.[1] In contrast, its active metabolite, desipramine, is a secondary amine and displays a much stronger affinity for NET.[3] This dual activity of the parent drug and its metabolite results in a broad-spectrum inhibition of both serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake, contributing to its robust antidepressant efficacy.
Unlike modern selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), Imipramine is a pharmacologically "dirty" drug, meaning it binds with significant affinity to several other neurotransmitter receptors. These interactions are not believed to contribute to its antidepressant effect but are directly responsible for its characteristic and often burdensome side-effect profile.[2]
Beyond its primary actions, Imipramine interacts with other systems that contribute to its overall clinical profile and suggest potential for future applications.
The mechanism by which Imipramine treats childhood enuresis provides a clear example of repurposing a side effect into a primary therapeutic action. The drug's efficacy in this condition is explicitly stated to be separate from its antidepressant effect.[17] The most plausible explanation lies in its potent anticholinergic properties.[4] In adults, antagonism of muscarinic receptors in the bladder detrusor muscle and urinary sphincter leads to the undesirable side effect of urinary retention.[1] In a child with nocturnal enuresis, this same pharmacological action becomes the desired therapeutic effect, increasing bladder capacity and strengthening sphincter tone to prevent involuntary urination during sleep. This is likely complemented by its ability to shorten the duration of deep, delta-wave sleep, the stage where enuretic events most often occur, making the child more easily arousable to the sensation of a full bladder.[3]
The clinical use of Imipramine is profoundly influenced by its pharmacokinetic profile, which is characterized by rapid absorption, extensive distribution, complex hepatic metabolism, and significant inter-individual variability.
Table 2: Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Imipramine and Desipramine | ||
---|---|---|
Parameter | Imipramine (Parent Drug) | Desipramine (Active Metabolite) |
Oral Bioavailability | 22−77% (Highly variable) 1 | N/A (Formed via metabolism) |
Time to Peak Plasma Conc. (Tmax) | 2−6 hours 1 | Longer than parent drug |
Volume of Distribution (Vd) | 10−20 L/kg 1 | High |
Plasma Protein Binding | 60−96% 1 | High |
Elimination Half-life (t1/2) | 11−25 hours (Mean: 12 h) 25 | Mean: 22.5 hours 26 |
Clearance | Mean: 1.0 L/h/kg 26 | Mean: 1.8 L/h/kg 26 |
Primary Metabolizing Enzymes | CYP2C19, CYP1A2, CYP3A4 (to Desipramine); CYP2D6 (Hydroxylation) 1 | CYP2D6 (Hydroxylation) 25 |
Following oral administration, Imipramine is rapidly and almost completely absorbed (>95%) from the gastrointestinal tract, with the primary site of absorption being the small intestine.[1] Its absorption is not significantly affected by the presence of food.[1] Despite its high absorption, Imipramine undergoes extensive first-pass metabolism in the liver, a process where a significant fraction of the drug is metabolized before it reaches systemic circulation.[3] This leads to a highly variable absolute oral bioavailability, which can range from as low as 22% to as high as 77% among individuals.[1] Peak plasma concentrations (
Tmax) are typically achieved within 2 to 6 hours after an oral dose.[1]
Imipramine is a highly lipophilic (fat-soluble) molecule, a property that allows it to be distributed widely throughout the body and to readily cross the blood-brain barrier to exert its effects in the central nervous system.[25] This is reflected in its large apparent volume of distribution (
Vd), which ranges from 10 to 20 L/kg.[1] A clinically significant feature of its distribution is its marked accumulation in brain tissue, where concentrations can reach levels 30 to 40 times higher than those found in the plasma.[1] While this high CNS penetration is essential for its therapeutic efficacy, it also directly contributes to the severe neurological toxicity (e.g., seizures, coma) observed in overdose scenarios, where the brain is exposed to extremely high drug concentrations. In circulation, Imipramine is extensively bound to plasma proteins, with a binding fraction ranging from 60% to 96%. It primarily binds to albumin and α1-acid glycoprotein.[1]
Imipramine is eliminated almost exclusively through extensive hepatic metabolism, primarily mediated by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme system.[1]
The reliance on CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 for its metabolism is a major source of clinical challenges. Both of these enzymes are genetically polymorphic, meaning that variations in their genes exist across the population, leading to different levels of enzyme activity (e.g., poor, intermediate, extensive, or ultra-rapid metabolizers). Consequently, a standard dose of Imipramine can result in vastly different plasma concentrations of both the parent drug and its active metabolite in different individuals. This high degree of pharmacokinetic unpredictability explains the clinical necessity for a "start low, go slow" dosing strategy and provides a strong rationale for the use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to guide dosing and minimize the risk of either therapeutic failure or toxicity.[4]
The metabolites of Imipramine are primarily eliminated from the body via the kidneys, with the majority being excreted in the urine.[25] Less than 5% of a dose is excreted as unchanged parent drug.[1] The elimination half-life (
t1/2) of Imipramine is variable, with a mean of approximately 12 hours (range 11-25 hours).[25] Its active metabolite, desipramine, has a significantly longer half-life, with a mean of 22.5 hours.[26] This long half-life of both the parent compound and its active metabolite contributes to the drug's sustained pharmacological effect and allows for once-daily dosing regimens.[5]
Imipramine's clinical utility spans both FDA-approved indications and a range of prevalent off-label uses, reflecting its broad pharmacological activity.
The multi-target engagement of Imipramine has led to its use in a variety of conditions beyond its approved indications. This therapeutic breadth is a direct consequence of its "dirty" pharmacology, where different mechanisms of action can be leveraged to treat disparate clinical problems.
The dosing of Imipramine requires careful individualization and slow titration to optimize efficacy while minimizing adverse effects.
Table 3: Dosing Guidelines for Approved and Off-Label Indications | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Indication | Patient Population | Starting Dose | Titration Schedule | Usual Maintenance / Max Dose |
Depression | Adult (Outpatient) | 75 mg/day | Increase by 25−50 mg increments | 150−200 mg/day (Max 200 mg/day) 23 |
Depression | Adult (Inpatient) | 100 mg/day | Gradual increase | Up to 300 mg/day 23 |
Depression | Geriatric & Adolescent | 25−40 mg/day | Increase by 10−25 mg every 3-7 days | Max 100 mg/day 4 |
Childhood Enuresis | Pediatric (≥6 years) | 25 mg at bedtime | May increase as needed after 1-2 weeks | Max 50 mg/day (6-12 yrs); Max 2.5 mg/kg/day overall 23 |
General Dosing Principles:
Imipramine is an effective medication, but its use is associated with a significant burden of adverse effects and serious safety risks that require careful management and patient monitoring.
The most severe warning issued by the FDA for Imipramine and other antidepressant medications concerns the risk of suicidality.[30]
The use of Imipramine is absolutely contraindicated in the following situations:
Imipramine's broad receptor-binding profile leads to a wide range of adverse effects.[1]
In geriatric patients, these risks are amplified, creating a specific "geriatric risk triad." First, age-related declines in hepatic and renal function lead to slower drug clearance and higher, more prolonged plasma concentrations.[27] Second, the elderly brain is more sensitive to anticholinergic effects, resulting in a much higher risk of confusion, delirium, and falls.[3] Third, geriatric patients have a higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease, making them more vulnerable to orthostatic hypotension and cardiac arrhythmias.[17] These factors synergize, creating a high-risk profile where slower clearance amplifies the drug's effects, and age-related sensitivities to those same effects dramatically increase the likelihood of a major adverse event.
Overdose with Imipramine is a medical emergency and can be fatal.[3] Children are particularly vulnerable to its cardiotoxic effects.[6]
Imipramine's complex metabolism and broad pharmacological profile create a high potential for drug-drug interactions. Over 700 interactions have been identified, with 144 classified as major.[35]
Table 4: Major Drug-Drug Interactions and Management Strategies | |||
---|---|---|---|
Interacting Drug Class | Mechanism of Interaction | Potential Clinical Outcome | Clinical Management Recommendation |
Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors (MAOIs) (e.g., phenelzine, tranylcypromine) | Pharmacodynamic (Synergistic monoamine increase) | Serotonin syndrome, hyperpyretic crisis, severe convulsions, death 17 | Contraindicated. A 14-day washout period is mandatory.27 |
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) (e.g., fluoxetine, sertraline) | Pharmacodynamic (Additive serotonergic effects) & Pharmacokinetic (CYP2D6 inhibition) | Increased risk of serotonin syndrome; markedly increased Imipramine levels and toxicity 25 | Generally avoid combination. If necessary, use with extreme caution, reduced doses, and close monitoring. |
Other Serotonergic Agents (e.g., triptans, tramadol, linezolid) | Pharmacodynamic (Additive serotonergic effects) | Increased risk of serotonin syndrome 30 | Avoid combination or use with extreme caution and patient education on symptoms. |
CNS Depressants (e.g., alcohol, benzodiazepines, opioids) | Pharmacodynamic (Additive sedation and respiratory depression) | Excessive drowsiness, impaired coordination, respiratory depression, coma 17 | Counsel patients to avoid alcohol. Use other CNS depressants with caution and at reduced doses. |
Anticholinergic Agents (e.g., diphenhydramine, oxybutynin) | Pharmacodynamic (Additive anticholinergic effects) | Severe constipation, paralytic ileus, urinary retention, blurred vision, delirium 4 | Avoid combination if possible, especially in the elderly. Monitor for anticholinergic toxicity. |
CYP2D6 Inhibitors (e.g., bupropion, quinidine) | Pharmacokinetic (Inhibition of Imipramine metabolism) | Increased plasma concentrations of Imipramine, leading to toxicity 25 | Monitor for adverse effects. Dose reduction of Imipramine may be necessary. |
CYP Inducers (e.g., carbamazepine, phenytoin, barbiturates) | Pharmacokinetic (Induction of Imipramine metabolism) | Decreased plasma concentrations of Imipramine, leading to loss of efficacy 29 | Monitor for reduced therapeutic effect. Dose increase of Imipramine may be necessary. |
This extensive interaction profile creates a significant risk for prescribing cascades, particularly in elderly patients with polypharmacy. For example, a patient prescribed Imipramine may develop urinary hesitancy as a side effect. If this is misdiagnosed as benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), the patient might be prescribed an alpha-blocker. The combination of Imipramine's own α1-antagonism with the new alpha-blocker could then lead to severe orthostatic hypotension, resulting in a fall and fracture. This chain reaction, where a drug side effect is treated with another drug that then causes a more severe adverse event, highlights the critical need for prescribers to have a deep pharmacological understanding of Imipramine and to practice vigilant medication reconciliation.
Imipramine occupies a unique and foundational place in the history of medicine. Its journey from a failed antipsychotic to the first effective antidepressant was a triumph of clinical observation that not only provided hope for millions suffering from depression but also gave rise to the neurochemical theories that have guided psychiatric research for over half a century. Its complex, multi-target pharmacology is a double-edged sword, providing a broad spectrum of therapeutic action that underpins its robust efficacy while simultaneously producing a challenging profile of adverse effects and drug interactions.
In contemporary clinical practice, Imipramine is no longer a first-line agent for depression. The advent of safer, better-tolerated medications, such as the SSRIs and SNRIs, has relegated it to a second or third-line role.[3] However, it remains an indispensable tool in the psychiatric armamentarium. For patients with severe, melancholic, or treatment-resistant depression, its potent and broad action on both serotonin and norepinephrine systems may provide a level of efficacy that more selective agents cannot match.[4] Furthermore, its established utility in childhood enuresis and various neuropathic pain syndromes secures its ongoing niche in the modern pharmacopeia.[3]
Intriguing preclinical research into novel mechanisms, such as Fascin1 inhibition for potential antitumor therapy, suggests that the full story of this nearly 70-year-old drug may not yet be complete.[14] Nevertheless, its primary legacy remains in psychiatry. Imipramine is a powerful medication that demands respect. Its safe and effective use requires a prescriber with a thorough understanding of its complex pharmacology, a commitment to careful patient selection, a patient and methodical approach to dose titration, and vigilant monitoring for adverse effects and interactions. Ultimately, the story of Imipramine is a crucial chapter in the evolution of psychopharmacology, serving as a perpetual reminder of the intricate balance between broad efficacy, target selectivity, and patient safety.
Published at: August 21, 2025
This report is continuously updated as new research emerges.
Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.
© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.