C13H22N4O3S
66357-35-5
Acid Aspiration Syndrome, Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS), Duodenal Ulcer, Erosive Esophagitis, Gastric Ulcer, Gastric hypersecretion, Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD), Healing, Heartburn, Osteoarthritis (OA), Peptic Ulcer Disease, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Stress Ulcers, Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome, Active Duodenal ulcer, Benign gastric ulcer healing, Benign gastric ulcers, Duodenal ulcer healing, Post-operative peptic ulcer, Recurrent hemorrhage from bleeding ulcers
[Ranitidine is a small molecule drug that, for decades, was a cornerstone in the management of acid-related gastrointestinal disorders. Its journey from a celebrated therapeutic agent to a product withdrawn from global markets is rooted in its fundamental chemical nature. A thorough understanding of its chemical identity, structure, and physicochemical properties is therefore essential, as these characteristics not only defined its therapeutic efficacy but also contained the latent potential for its ultimate failure. This section provides a definitive chemical and physical fingerprint of ranitidine, establishing the foundation for the subsequent analysis of its pharmacology, clinical use, and regulatory history.]
[To unambiguously identify the compound across scientific literature, regulatory documents, and clinical practice, a comprehensive list of its names and identifiers is crucial. Ranitidine was marketed globally under a multitude of brand names and is cataloged in numerous chemical and pharmacological databases.]
[The most widely recognized brand name for ranitidine was Zantac.][1][ Other brand names used in the United States and internationally included Acid Reducer, Taladine, Berkley and Jensen Acid Reducer Maximum Strength, and Deprizine.][4][ Synonyms encountered in various markets include Ratic, Raticina, RND, Sampep, Taural, Zantic, Azantac, Raniplex, and Ranidil.][5][ The international nonproprietary name (INN) system also provides standardized names in different languages, such as]
Ranitidin[ (German), ]Ranitidina[ (Spanish), and ]Ranitidinum[ (Latin).][1]
[For scientific and regulatory purposes, ranitidine is cataloged under a series of unique identifiers that facilitate precise cross-referencing. These identifiers are critical for data retrieval and integration from diverse sources.]
Table 1: Chemical and Physical Identifiers of Ranitidine
Property | Value | Source(s) |
---|---|---|
DrugBank ID | DB00863 | 1 |
CAS Number (free base) | 66357-35-5 | 1 |
IUPAC Name | (E)-1-N'-[[(dimethylamino)methyl]furan-2-yl]methylsulfanyl]ethyl]-1-N-methyl-2-nitroethene-1,1-diamine | 1 |
Chemical Formula | C13H22N4O3S | 2 |
Molecular Weight (free base) | 314.4 g/mol | 2 |
Common Brand Names | Zantac, Acid Reducer, Taladine, Deprizine, Taural | 1 |
Chemical Class | Furan, Tertiary amino compound, C-nitro compound, Organic sulfide | 1 |
ATC Codes | A02BA02, A02BA07 | 4 |
FDA UNII | 884KT10YB7 | 6 |
PubChem CID | 3001055 | 3 |
ChEBI ID | CHEBI:8776 | 1 |
[The therapeutic activity and chemical stability of ranitidine are direct consequences of its molecular architecture. It is classified as a member of the class of furans, a tertiary amino compound, a C-nitro compound, and an organic sulfide.][1][ These classifications point to the key functional groups that dictate its biological and chemical behavior.]
[The definitive chemical structure is captured by its International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) name: (E)-1-N'-[[(dimethylamino)methyl]furan-2-yl]methylsulfanyl]ethyl]-1-N-methyl-2-nitroethene-1,1-diamine.][1][ This systematic name precisely describes the spatial arrangement of every atom and functional group within the molecule.]
[The molecular formula for the ranitidine free base is C13H22N4O3S.][2][ This corresponds to an average molecular weight of approximately 314.4 g/mol.][2][ The most common pharmaceutical form, ranitidine hydrochloride (ranitidine HCl), has the empirical formula]
[C13H22N4O3S⋅HCl and a molecular weight of 350.87 g/mol.][8]
[To provide an unambiguous digital representation of its structure, several standard chemical informatics formats are used:]
[The molecular structure of ranitidine contains the very elements that would ultimately lead to its market withdrawal. The presence of a dimethylamine group (a tertiary amine) and a nitroethenediamine moiety (which contains a nitro group, a nitrogen-oxygen functional group) within the same molecule creates an inherent chemical vulnerability. This architecture makes the molecule susceptible to degradation, particularly under conditions of heat, into N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA), a probable human carcinogen.][10][ The celebrated design that conferred potent histamine H2-receptor antagonism also harbored a latent, catastrophic flaw, a connection that links the drug's basic chemistry directly to its regulatory fate.]
[The physicochemical properties of ranitidine dictate its formulation into stable dosage forms, its behavior in the body, and its shelf-life stability.]
[The clinical success of ranitidine was built upon a well-defined and advantageous pharmacological profile. Its mechanism of action provided potent and specific control over gastric acid secretion, while its pharmacokinetic properties offered a predictable course of action within the body. This section provides a detailed analysis of ranitidine's pharmacodynamics (what the drug does to the body) and pharmacokinetics (what the body does to the drug), including how these properties vary across different patient populations.]
[Ranitidine's therapeutic effect stems from its function as a ]histamine H2-receptor antagonist[.][1][ Its interaction with this receptor is both]
competitive and reversible[, meaning it competes with endogenous histamine for the same binding site and can dissociate from the receptor, allowing for the eventual return of normal function.][3]
[The physiological process of gastric acid secretion is complex, involving multiple signaling pathways that converge on the stomach's parietal cells. After a meal, the hormone gastrin stimulates local enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cells to release histamine.][2][ Histamine then binds to H2-receptors located on the basolateral (blood-facing) membrane of the gastric parietal cells.][2][ This binding event triggers an intracellular cascade, activating the enzyme adenylate cyclase, which increases levels of cyclic AMP (]
[cAMP). The rise in cAMP activates protein kinase A, which in turn stimulates the final step in acid production: the H+/K+ ATPase enzyme, commonly known as the proton pump. This pump actively secretes hydrogen ions (H+) into the stomach lumen, creating gastric acid.][15]
[Ranitidine works by selectively blocking this "upstream" step. By occupying the H2-receptor, it prevents histamine from binding and initiating the signaling cascade.][13][ This results in a potent and sustained]
reduction in gastric acid secretion[. The effect is particularly pronounced for basal (fasting) and nocturnal acid secretion but also effectively inhibits acid production stimulated by food, gastrin, and other secretagogues.][2][ A single dose can reduce 24-hour gastric acid production by approximately 70%.][13][ This mechanism provided rapid and effective symptomatic relief, with effects occurring as soon as 60 minutes after administration and lasting from 4 to 10 hours.][2][ Serum concentrations necessary to inhibit 50% of stimulated gastric acid secretion (]
[IC50) are estimated to be in the range of 36 to 94 ng/mL.][9]
[Beyond its primary effect on acid secretion, ranitidine has several secondary effects:]
[This combination of high potency (on a weight basis, ranitidine is 4 to 9 times more potent than cimetidine ][16][) and a lack of hormonal side effects was a key driver of its clinical adoption and commercial success. Furthermore, its minimal impact on the hepatic cytochrome P-450 enzyme system, unlike the significant inhibition caused by cimetidine, meant it was associated with far fewer drug-drug interactions, making it a safer and more predictable choice for a broad range of patients, particularly those on multiple medications.][6]
[The movement and processing of ranitidine within the body follows a well-characterized path, which is crucial for determining appropriate dosing schedules and understanding its behavior in specific patient populations.]
[The pharmacokinetic profile of ranitidine is significantly altered in specific patient populations, necessitating careful dose adjustments to ensure safety and efficacy. The drug's heavy reliance on renal excretion is the single most important factor driving these adjustments.]
[This direct, causal relationship—high renal clearance leading to dependence on kidney function, which in turn leads to a prolonged half-life in the elderly and renally impaired—formed the cornerstone of safe prescribing guidelines for ranitidine. It is a classic example of how fundamental pharmacokinetic principles directly translate into critical clinical practice.]
Table 2: Key Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Ranitidine in Different Populations
Parameter | Healthy Adult | Geriatric Patient | Pediatric Patient (>1 month) | Patient with Severe Renal Impairment (CrCl <50 mL/min) | Source(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oral Bioavailability | ~50-60% | ~50% (50% higher exposure) | ~48% | Bioavailability may increase | 3 |
Protein Binding | ~15% | ~15% | ~15% | ~15% | 3 |
Volume of Distribution | ~1.4 L/kg | Similar to adult | Similar to adult (weight-corrected) | 1.76 L/kg | 16 |
Elimination Half-Life | 2.5-3.0 hours (oral) | 3-4 hours | Similar to adult (weight-corrected) | 4-5 hours or longer | 3 |
Renal Clearance | ~410 mL/min | Reduced | Similar to adult (weight-corrected) | Significantly reduced (e.g., 29 mL/min) | 9 |
[For nearly four decades, ranitidine was a ubiquitous therapeutic agent, its market penetration driven by a combination of proven efficacy, a favorable safety profile relative to its predecessors, and remarkable versatility. Its availability in multiple formulations and strengths for a wide spectrum of indications made it a go-to choice for clinicians treating acid-related disorders and a popular over-the-counter remedy for consumers. This widespread use is precisely what magnified the public health impact of its eventual withdrawal from the market. This section details the historical clinical applications of ranitidine, its various dosage forms, and the specific administration guidelines that governed its use.]
[Ranitidine was indicated for the treatment and prevention of a broad range of conditions characterized by excessive or inappropriate gastric acid secretion.][1]
Approved Prescription Indications:
Approved Over-the-Counter (OTC) Indications:
Common Off-Label Uses:
Beyond its approved indications, clinicians used ranitidine for several other purposes based on its mechanism of action:
[The clinical versatility of ranitidine was enhanced by its availability in a wide array of dosage forms, allowing for tailored therapy in diverse settings, from home use to intensive care units.][1]
[Dosing for ranitidine was highly individualized based on the indication, severity of the condition, patient age, and, most importantly, renal function. The following table synthesizes the standard historical dosing guidelines from multiple sources into a comprehensive reference.]
Table 3: Comprehensive Dosage and Administration Guidelines for Ranitidine
Indication | Patient Population | Oral Dosage | Parenteral Dosage | Key Clinical Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Active Duodenal Ulcer | Adult | 150 mg BID or 300 mg once daily at bedtime | 50 mg IV/IM q6-8h or 6.25 mg/hr continuous IV infusion | Treatment typically for 4-8 weeks. Antacids could be used for pain relief. 19 |
Pediatric (1mo-16yr) | 2-4 mg/kg BID (Max: 300 mg/day) | 2-4 mg/kg/day IV divided q6-8h (Max: 200 mg/day) | Recommendation derived from adult trials and pediatric pharmacokinetic data. 19 | |
Duodenal Ulcer Maintenance | Adult | 150 mg once daily at bedtime | N/A | Placebo-controlled studies did not extend beyond 1 year. 19 |
Pediatric (1mo-16yr) | 2-4 mg/kg once daily (Max: 150 mg/day) | N/A | Recommendation derived from adult trials and pediatric pharmacokinetic data. 19 | |
Benign Gastric Ulcer | Adult | 150 mg BID | 50 mg IV/IM q6-8h | Treatment typically for up to 6 weeks. 19 |
Pediatric (1mo-16yr) | 2-4 mg/kg BID (Max: 300 mg/day) | 2-4 mg/kg/day IV divided q6-8h (Max: 200 mg/day) | Recommendation derived from adult trials and pediatric pharmacokinetic data. 19 | |
GERD | Adult | 150 mg BID | 50 mg IV/IM q6-8h | Symptomatic relief usually occurs within 24 hours. 21 |
Pediatric (1mo-16yr) | 5-10 mg/kg/day PO divided BID (Max: 300 mg/day) | 2-4 mg/kg/day IV divided q6-8h (Off-label) | Published literature supports this dosing range. 19 | |
Erosive Esophagitis | Adult | Treatment: 150 mg QID Maintenance: 150 mg BID | 50 mg IV/IM q6-8h | Maintenance therapy could extend up to 48 weeks. 19 |
Pediatric (1mo-16yr) | 5-10 mg/kg/day PO divided BID (Max: 300 mg/day) | 2-4 mg/kg/day IV divided q6-8h (Off-label) | Published literature supports this dosing range. 21 | |
Pathological Hypersecretion (e.g., Zollinger-Ellison) | Adult | 150 mg BID, titrated up as needed. Doses up to 6 g/day have been used. | Start 1.0 mg/kg/hr continuous IV infusion, titrate based on gastric acid output. | Dosing is highly individualized and continues as long as clinically indicated. 19 |
OTC Heartburn | Adult & Child >12yr | Relief: 75-150 mg with water as needed. Prevention: 75-150 mg 30-60 min before a meal. | N/A | Do not exceed 2 tablets in 24 hours. Do not use for more than 14 consecutive days without consulting a doctor. 23 |
Dosage Adjustment in Renal Impairment:
[Prior to the discovery of N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) contamination in 2019, ranitidine was widely regarded as a safe and well-tolerated medication. Its safety profile was well-characterized over decades of clinical use and was considered a significant improvement over its predecessor, cimetidine. The known risks were generally predictable, manageable, and linked to either its mechanism of action or its pharmacokinetic properties in vulnerable populations. This established perception of safety is what made the revelation of a hidden, intrinsic carcinogenic risk so profoundly shocking to the medical community and the public. This section details the clinical safety profile of ranitidine as it was understood before the NDMA crisis.]
[Ranitidine was generally well-tolerated, with most side effects being mild and transient. However, rare but serious adverse reactions were documented.]
Common Adverse Reactions:
The most frequently reported side effects were minor and included:
Rare but Serious Adverse Reactions:
[The prescribing information for ranitidine included several important contraindications and warnings to guide safe clinical use.]
[Compared to cimetidine, ranitidine had a more favorable drug interaction profile due to its weak inhibition of the cytochrome P-450 system. Nevertheless, several clinically significant interactions were known.]
Drug-Drug Interactions:
The interactions primarily stemmed from two mechanisms: alteration of gastric pH and, to a lesser extent, effects on drug metabolism or transport.
Drug-Food and Drug-Nutrient Interactions:
Long-term use of ranitidine could interfere with the absorption of certain nutrients that depend on stomach acid for their release from food.
Table 4: Clinically Significant Drug-Drug and Drug-Nutrient Interactions
Interacting Agent | Mechanism of Interaction | Clinical Consequence | Management Recommendation | Source(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ketoconazole, Itraconazole | Increased gastric pH reduces dissolution and absorption of the antifungal. | Potential for antifungal treatment failure. | Administer antifungal with an acidic beverage (e.g., cola); monitor for efficacy. Avoid combination if possible. | 28 |
Atazanavir, Dasatinib, Sotorasib | Increased gastric pH reduces absorption of the antiviral/anticancer agent. | Decreased plasma concentrations and potential loss of therapeutic effect. | Avoid concomitant use. If necessary, separate administration by several hours as specified in the interacting drug's label. | 22 |
Warfarin | Unclear; may involve weak inhibition of metabolism. | Reports of both increased and decreased prothrombin time (INR). | Monitor INR closely when starting, stopping, or changing the dose of ranitidine. | 16 |
Sucralfate (high dose) | Binds to ranitidine in the GI tract, reducing its absorption. | Decreased ranitidine efficacy. | Administer sucralfate at least 2 hours after ranitidine. | 16 |
Vitamin B12 (dietary) | Reduced gastric acid impairs release of B12 from food proteins. | Risk of vitamin B12 deficiency with long-term use. | Monitor B12 levels in patients on chronic therapy; consider supplementation if necessary. | 26 |
Iron (non-heme) | Reduced gastric acid decreases dissolution and absorption of iron. | Potential for decreased iron stores or iron-deficiency anemia with long-term use. | Monitor iron status in at-risk patients (e.g., those with anemia or marginal iron stores). | 32 |
[The story of ranitidine took a dramatic and definitive turn in 2019, transforming it from a trusted medication into a subject of global regulatory action and public concern. The discovery of the probable human carcinogen N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) in ranitidine products triggered a cascade of investigations, recalls, and ultimately, a complete market withdrawal in major jurisdictions. This crisis was not a simple case of external contamination but a more complex problem rooted in the very chemistry of the drug itself. This section provides a detailed chronological and scientific analysis of the NDMA crisis, the coordinated global regulatory response, and the lasting impact on clinical practice.]
[The agent at the center of the crisis, N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA), is a semi-volatile organic chemical classified as a probable human carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and other health authorities.][10][ This classification is based on extensive evidence from animal studies, which have shown that chronic exposure to NDMA can cause tumors in various organs, including the liver, lungs, and stomach.][10][ While NDMA is a ubiquitous environmental contaminant found in trace amounts in some foods (like cured meats), water supplies, and industrial byproducts, its presence in pharmaceuticals at levels exceeding the acceptable daily intake (ADI) limit of 96 nanograms per day is considered an unacceptable risk.][10]
[The source of NDMA in ranitidine products proved to be fundamentally different from that found in other drugs, such as the sartan class of antihypertensives. In the sartan cases, NDMA was primarily a process-related impurity, formed during specific manufacturing synthesis steps.][10][ For ranitidine, however, investigations revealed a more alarming cause: the]
inherent chemical instability of the ranitidine molecule itself[.][10]
[The ranitidine molecule contains both a dimethylamine moiety and a nitro group, which are precursors that can degrade and react to form NDMA.][10][ Crucially, this degradation was found to be a time- and temperature-dependent process. Laboratory studies confirmed that levels of NDMA in ranitidine products could]
increase significantly over time and when stored at temperatures higher than normal room temperature[.][10][ This meant that a batch of ranitidine could test within acceptable NDMA limits at the time of manufacture but exceed the safe daily intake limit by the time it reached the consumer, having been subjected to variable conditions during distribution and storage.][10]
[This finding represented a paradigm shift in the understanding of the problem. It was not a static contamination issue that could be solved by changing manufacturing processes or recalling specific lots. Instead, it was a dynamic problem inherent to the drug product's lifecycle. The very molecule designed to be a therapeutic agent was also a latent source of a carcinogen.]
[Adding to the complexity were unresolved questions about whether NDMA could also be formed ]in vivo[—that is, inside the human body after the drug was ingested. Some studies suggested that ranitidine could degrade or be metabolized in the gastrointestinal tract to form NDMA, with one study reporting a 400-fold increase in urinary NDMA excretion in volunteers after taking ranitidine.][11][ Other studies did not confirm this finding.][11][ This uncertainty about in vivo formation, combined with the confirmed evidence of shelf-life instability, contributed to the precautionary approach ultimately taken by regulators.]
[The response to the ranitidine crisis was swift and global, led by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA). While their actions were coordinated, the timeline and terminology of their final decisions differed slightly.]
Table 5: Chronology of Key Regulatory Actions on Ranitidine by the FDA and EMA
Date | Regulatory Body | Action Taken | Key Justification/Rationale | Source(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sept 12, 2019 | EMA | Initiated an Article 31 review of all ranitidine-containing medicines. | At the request of the European Commission, following the detection of NDMA. | 34 |
Sept 13, 2019 | FDA | Issued first public statement alerting patients and healthcare professionals to the detection of NDMA in ranitidine samples. | To inform the public of the ongoing investigation into the impurity. | 37 |
Late 2019 - Early 2020 | FDA & EMA | Oversaw numerous voluntary recalls by manufacturers as their own testing confirmed NDMA levels above the acceptable daily intake limit. | Precautionary measure to remove contaminated lots from the market while the investigation continued. | 11 |
April 1, 2020 | FDA | Requested the immediate market withdrawal of all prescription and OTC ranitidine products. | New data showed that NDMA impurity levels can increase over time and with storage at higher than room temperatures, potentially resulting in unacceptable exposure for consumers. | 10 |
April 30, 2020 | EMA (CHMP) | Recommended the suspension of all ranitidine medicines in the EU. | Presence of NDMA above acceptable levels and unresolved uncertainties about its formation from ranitidine degradation over its shelf life and potentially inside the body. | 11 |
Sept 17, 2020 | EMA (CHMP) | Confirmed its recommendation to suspend all ranitidine medicines in the EU after a re-examination. | The initial concerns remained valid. The CHMP maintained conditions for lifting the suspension, requiring more data from companies. | 11 |
Nov 24, 2020 | European Commission | Issued a final, legally binding decision making the suspension applicable in all EU Member States. | To formally implement the CHMP's final scientific recommendation. | 11 |
[The FDA's final action was a formal request for a market withdrawal, citing the unacceptable risk posed by the drug's inherent instability. The EMA used the term "suspension," which, while having a similar practical effect of removing the products from the market, also outlined conditions under which the suspension could theoretically be lifted, such as the provision of new data demonstrating safety.][34][ However, given the nature of the problem, a return to the market was highly unlikely.]
[The global regulatory actions effectively ended the clinical use of ranitidine, a drug that had been a mainstay of gastrointestinal therapy for decades. This created a significant disruption in patient care and forced a rapid and large-scale shift in prescribing practices.]
[A major retrospective cohort study conducted using primary care records from six European countries quantified this impact. The study showed that ranitidine, which had been the most commonly prescribed H2-receptor antagonist in the pre-referral period (before September 2019), saw its incidence of use decline steeply during the regulatory review and then plummet to virtually zero in the post-referral period (from April 2020 onwards).][14]
[Healthcare providers and patients had to find alternatives. The data clearly show that the withdrawal of ranitidine led to a massive therapeutic substitution, with the majority of patients being switched to other classes of acid-suppressing medications. The primary beneficiaries of this shift were the ]Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs)[, such as omeprazole, lansoprazole, and esomeprazole, as well as the other available H2-blocker, famotidine, which did not share ranitidine's instability issues.][14][ This regulator-driven event permanently altered the therapeutic landscape for common conditions like GERD and peptic ulcer disease, cementing the dominance of PPIs in the management of these disorders.]
[The history of ranitidine is a story of two distinct and opposing legacies. For over thirty years, it was a paragon of successful pharmaceutical development: a potent, effective, and versatile therapeutic agent that provided relief to hundreds of millions of patients worldwide. It represented a significant advancement over its predecessor, cimetidine, offering a cleaner safety profile and fewer drug interactions. Its journey from prescription blockbuster to trusted over-the-counter staple cemented its place as a cornerstone of therapy for acid-related gastrointestinal disorders.]
[However, its second legacy is that of a cautionary tale, a stark illustration of a previously underappreciated risk in modern pharmaceutical science. The N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) crisis was not a simple failure of manufacturing quality control but a failure rooted in the fundamental chemistry of the drug itself. The very molecular structure that conferred its therapeutic benefit also harbored an intrinsic instability, allowing for the time- and temperature-dependent degradation into a probable human carcinogen.]
[The ranitidine case has had profound and lasting implications for the pharmaceutical industry and its regulators. It has forced a critical re-evaluation of drug safety that extends beyond the initial point of manufacture. The key lesson from ranitidine's downfall is the critical importance of evaluating a drug's ]inherent molecular stability throughout its entire lifecycle[, from production through distribution, storage, and even after administration. The decisive factor for its complete market withdrawal was not the NDMA level at the factory gate, but the unacceptable potential for it to increase to unsafe levels in a consumer's medicine cabinet.]
[This has prompted a paradigm shift in regulatory thinking. Traditional stability testing protocols are being scrutinized, and there is a new emphasis on understanding how real-world conditions can impact drug product quality and safety over time. The ranitidine crisis, therefore, serves as a pivotal case study that has reshaped our understanding of drug quality and has spurred necessary evolution in the regulatory frameworks designed to protect public health. While ranitidine is no longer a part of the clinical armamentarium, its legacy endures in the heightened standards of safety, stability, and lifecycle management that it has imposed upon the field of pharmaceutical science.]
Published at: August 12, 2025
This report is continuously updated as new research emerges.
Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.
© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.