Three Essential Medicines Classified as Carcinogenic by IARC; Experts Urge Continued Treatment with Monitoring
核心洞察
The IARC has classified hydrochlorothiazide, voriconazole, and tacrolimus as Group 1 carcinogens, published in Volume 137 of the IARC Monographs.
Hydrochlorothiazide and voriconazole are linked to squamous cell skin carcinoma (搜索) via phototoxicity, while tacrolimus raises risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (搜索) through immunosuppression.
All three drugs remain on the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines; experts stress patients should not discontinue treatment without consulting their doctors.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (搜索) (IARC), the World Health Organization's specialized cancer research agency, has classified three widely prescribed medicines as "carcinogenic to humans" (Group 1). The drugs — hydrochlorothiazide, voriconazole, and tacrolimus — all appear on the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines and are prescribed to millions of people worldwide. The assessment, published as Volume 137 of the IARC Monographs, expands on conclusions first released in The Lancet Oncology in November 2024. The 22-member expert panel included Indian scientist G.B. Jena.
Experts emphasized that the classification represents a hazard identification and should not prompt patients to discontinue treatment without consulting their doctors. "The IARC classification is highly relevant, particularly in India," said Kabir Sardana, Director, Professor and Head of the Department of Dermatology at Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences and Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital.
Mechanisms of Carcinogenicity
IARC found sufficient evidence that hydrochlorothiazide causes squamous cell skin carcinoma (搜索) and lip cancer. Studies from Denmark and the United States documented higher rates of non-melanoma skin cancers among long-term users, attributed to phototoxicity — the drug heightens skin sensitivity to UV radiation, raising the risk of DNA damage after sun exposure.
Voriconazole was similarly linked to squamous cell skin carcinoma (搜索) in transplant recipients on prolonged therapy, operating through the same phototoxic mechanism. Tacrolimus, by contrast, was linked to non-Hodgkin lymphoma (搜索) and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (搜索), with limited evidence for leukaemia and skin carcinoma. Unlike the other two agents, tacrolimus's risk stems from immunosuppression, which weakens the body's ability to clear abnormal cells.
The IARC Monographs identify whether an agent can cause cancer under certain circumstances but do not assess real-world risk at prescribed doses.
Clinical Implications in India
In India, hydrochlorothiazide serves as a common first-line hypertension therapy, voriconazole is routinely used in immunocompromised patients, and tacrolimus underpins post-transplant care. Sardana noted that hydrochlorothiazide has long been recognized as carrying a risk, particularly in rural areas, the Northeast, hilly and coastal regions, and among outdoor workers such as farmers who are exposed to high levels of ultraviolet radiation.
Voriconazole presents an additional concern beyond its known association with skin cancer risk. Sardana observed that the drug "is frequently prescribed without labelled indications, including for fungal skin infections caused by Trichophyton indotineae." He added that "doctors welcome measures to curb such inappropriate use."
"We cannot ignore these warnings in a country where irrational prescribing, over-the-counter availability, and poor adherence to ethical prescribing and dispensing practices remain significant challenges," Sardana stated.
Recommendations for Patients and Clinicians
Doctors recommend that patients on hydrochlorothiazide or voriconazole should maintain sun-protection measures, including sunscreen use, limiting UV exposure, and undergoing periodic skin checks. Transplant patients on tacrolimus are already routinely monitored for skin cancers and lymphoproliferative disorders.
Experts stress that patients should not stop or alter medication without medical advice, since these drugs treat serious, often life-threatening, conditions. The priority, they said, is informed prescribing and monitoring, not a shift away from treatments whose benefits remain established.
