Evolution of Robotic Cholecystectomy; the U.C. Davis Experience.
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 200
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Comparing hernia rates between multi-port verses single port approaches.
研究概览
简要总结
Comparing the use of surgical robotics during a Cholecystectomy, comparing different platforms and approaches (multi port verses single port).
详细描述
This study is a restrospective review of charts, including operating room notes as well as operating room documentation of procedures. Currently there are numerous methods considered to be the Standard of Care in the surgical treatment of Cholecystitis, or Cholelithiasis, including Open Surgery, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery. This study retrospectively reviews the intraoperative and post operative clinical outcomes of Laparoscopic and Robotic Assisted Surgery at U.C. Davis Medical Center to: 1) establish the role of robotics in laparoscopic surgery, and 2) to assess the learning curve by surgeons.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Other
- 时间视角
- Retrospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 65 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Patients that have undergone robotic assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy
排除标准
- •Patients under the age of 18, or not choosing to have surgery.
结局指标
主要结局
Comparing hernia rates between multi-port verses single port approaches.
时间窗: June 2004 through May 2015
Comparing multi port and single port approaches. Patients will be followed up under the standard of care model, normal clinical follow-ups required post surgery (10 Days to 2 weeks post operative) with additional clinical visits as required to monitor post operative complications (if any).
次要结局
未报告次要终点