跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00284466
NCT00284466已完成不适用

Comparing Angiography: Multislice CT vs. Invasive Heart Catheterization (CACTI)

University of Wisconsin, Madison2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 50 人开始时间: 2006年1月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
50
试验地点
2
主要终点
The primary endpoint of the study is the ability of CTA to detect coronary disease of greater than 50% diameter stenosis (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value) analyzed on a subject basis.

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of the study is to compare the pictures of heart arteries obtained by MSCT scanner to the pictures obtained during heart catheterization. Our specific question is whether the MSCT scanner is accurate enough to replace heart catheterization in some situations for the evaluation of coronary heart disease.

详细描述

QUESTION: Compare the accuracy of multi-slice CT angiography (CTA) with invasive catheterization (Cath) in detecting and grading coronary lesions.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A prospective cohort analysis comparing the quantification of coronary atherosclerosis by Computed Tomographic angiography to that of invasive Catheterization. Subjects will be patients who are scheduled for non-urgent cardiac cath based on a clinical need to evaluate the coronary anatomy. Cath may be scheduled after a positive stress test or on the basis of concerning symptoms. If a patient consents to participation they will be scheduled for CTA no less than 3 and no more than 30 days prior to Cath. Comparison of lesions detected by the two imaging modalities in the proximal, mid and distal coronary arteries will be made. Grades of disease used will be the following 1). less than 50% 2). 50-75% 3). greater than 75% 4) Uninterpretable. Sensitivity and specificity will be calculated for CTA; in addition PPV and NPV will also be calculated. The 2 readers of the CTA will be blinded to the invasive angiography results. The 2 readers of the invasive angiography, who are blinded to the CTA results will be the standard of comparison. Analysis of data will be performed on a segmental, vessel, and patient basis.

POTENTIAL RISK: Risks associated with contrast exposure include the risk of allergic reaction and renal injury. There is a small risk of excessive bradycardia and hypotension with administration of metoprolol and nitroglycerine. CTA is associated with radiation exposure similar to the lower range of diagnostic catheterization.

POTENTIAL BENEFITS: No direct benefits are expected for the subjects of this study as the information will not be used to alter clinical decisions. Benefits to future patients may include the development of an non-invasive alternative to cardiac catheterization.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Subjects >18 years old with stable clinical symptoms who are scheduled for outpatient cardiac catheterization.
  • Able to provide written informed consent in accordance with the IRB.

排除标准

  • Symptoms of unstable angina/acute coronary syndrome
  • Known allergy or adverse reaction to CT radiocontrast and/or iodine.
  • Known absolute contraindication to Metoprolol.
  • Significant kidney disease including creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL or GFR < 60 ml/min.
  • Inability to breath-hold for up to 30 seconds.
  • Women who are Pregnant or Nursing
  • Atrial Fibrillation or any other arrhythmia that makes attaining a regular slow rhythm unlikely.
  • History of previous stent placement or coronary bypass surgery.

结局指标

主要结局

The primary endpoint of the study is the ability of CTA to detect coronary disease of greater than 50% diameter stenosis (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value) analyzed on a subject basis.

时间窗: assess at time of CTA

次要结局

  • Assess CTA performance on both a vessel and coronary segment basis(assessed at time of CTA)
  • Estimate the impact of coronary calcium score on ability to assess for coronary disease(assessed at time of CTA)
  • Evaluate impact of scan quality of CTA performance measures(assessed at time of CTA)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验