JPRN-UMIN000014636已完成未知
Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation A prospective randomized study - Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 未知
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 70
研究概览
简要总结
McGrath was effective than McL for tracheal intubation of double lumen tube.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 20years-old 至 80years-old（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- 未提供
排除标准
- •Patients with anticipated difficult airway
研究者
相似试验
已完成
不适用
Comparison of the Videolaryngoscopes With Manual In-line StabilizationOral SurgeryMaxillofacial SurgeryNCT02647606Ajou University School of Medicine120
已完成
不适用
Videolaryngoscopy for Intubation in Patients With DiabetesAnesthesiaVideolaryngoscopyDiabetes MellitusDifficult IntubationNCT03089528Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital85
已完成
不适用
McGrath Videolaryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy Rapid Sequence IntubationSurgeryNCT05850052The Cleveland Clinic400
Unknown
不适用
Mcgrath Videolaryngoscope Versus Macintosh Laryngoscope in Patients With Manual In-line StabilizationAnesthesia, GeneralNCT03516539Hallym University Medical Center100
已完成
不适用
Effects of C-MAC Videolaryngoscope, McGRATH Videolaryngoscope and Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope on Intraocular Pressure and HemodynamicsAnesthesiology Devices Associated With Adverse IncidentsIntraocular PressureNCT03589638Inonu University3