JPRN-UMIN000014636
已完成
未知
Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation A prospective randomized study - Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation
概览
- 阶段
- 未知
- 干预措施
- 未指定
- 疾病 / 适应症
- Patients who underwent general anesthesia
- 发起方
- Osaka Medical College
- 入组人数
- 70
- 状态
- 已完成
- 最后更新
- 2年前
概览
简要总结
McGrath was effective than McL for tracheal intubation of double lumen tube.
研究者
入排标准
入选标准
- 未提供
排除标准
- •Patients with anticipated difficult airway
结局指标
主要结局
未指定
相似试验
已完成
不适用
Comparison of the Videolaryngoscopes With Manual In-line StabilizationOral SurgeryMaxillofacial SurgeryNCT02647606Ajou University School of Medicine120
已完成
不适用
Videolaryngoscopy for Intubation in Patients With DiabetesAnesthesiaDiabetes MellitusIntubation;DifficultVideolaryngoscopyNCT03089528Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital85
已完成
不适用
McGrath Videolaryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy Rapid Sequence IntubationSurgeryNCT05850052The Cleveland Clinic400
Unknown
不适用
Mcgrath Videolaryngoscope Versus Macintosh Laryngoscope in Patients With Manual In-line StabilizationAnesthesia, GeneralNCT03516539Hallym University Medical Center100
已完成
不适用
Effects of C-MAC Videolaryngoscope, McGRATH Videolaryngoscope and Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope on Intraocular Pressure and HemodynamicsAnesthesiology Devices Associated With Adverse IncidentsIntraocular PressureNCT03589638Inonu University3