Differential Effects of in Vivo and Virtual Exposure Therapy on the Interoception and Reactivity of Different Body Systems in Agoraphobia

Anxiety disorders are among the most common mental illnesses in the German population. Agoraphobia is an anxiety disorder characterized by the avoidance of specific places. Individuals affected by agoraphobia, for example, avoid crowds, public transportation, or traveling far from home, which significantly impacts their daily life. Due to the high psychological distress experienced by those affected, they often seek treatment, making agoraphobia one of the most common diagnoses in outpatient psychotherapy. Cognitive-behavioral therapy with exposure in vivo is considered the "gold standard" of psychotherapeutic treatment for agoraphobia, as it consistently shows high therapeutic effects. However, studies show that 90% of agoraphobic patients take psychotropic medication, and only 17% are in psychotherapeutic treatment. Despite the effectiveness of exposure therapy, it is rarely used in outpatient practice. Based on a survey, only 13-17% of psychotherapists conduct exposure therapy. Other studies indicate that only 8% of agoraphobic patients receive exposure therapy. Due to persistent avoidance behaviors and the limited availability of effective exposure therapy, the suffering and likelihood of chronicity of the condition increase.

Exposure therapy in virtual reality (VR) seems to offer a promising solution to this problem due to its ease of implementation compared to in vivo exposure. By programming anxiety-inducing scenarios for agoraphobic patients in VR, exposure could be conducted with less time and cost. Additionally, it offers other benefits such as the individual customization of anxiety-inducing scenarios. Various studies have already demonstrated the effectiveness of Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy (VRET) in treating various anxiety disorders. In agoraphobic patients, significant reductions in subjectively reported symptoms have been observed, as well as an impact of VRET on psychophysiological measures (e.g., electrodermal activity) indicating physiological arousal during exposure. Both in vivo exposure and VR exposure lead to a reduction in subjective symptoms in agoraphobic patients, and initial effects on psychophysiological parameters (e.g., heart rate variability) have been demonstrated.

Despite the positive effects of in vivo exposure therapy and VRET, agoraphobic symptoms often persist after psychotherapeutic treatment or there is a recurrence of symptoms after initial improvement. Previous studies have identified various factors that could contribute to maintaining the symptoms. In the planned study, interoception and the function of different body systems are the focus as maintaining factors of agoraphobia. It will be investigated how these factors influence treatment outcomes and are influenced by exposure therapies (in vivo vs. VR).

Interception as a maintaining factor of agoraphobia Interoception, the perception of body symptoms, plays a key role in cognitive-behavioral models of mental disorders. In patients with panic disorder (PD), it has been found that they have more accurate cardiac interoceptive rates than healthy controls. Specifically, it has been shown that good heartbeat perception is associated with high relapse rates. In the context of panic attacks, more accurate perception of a rapid heartbeat could contribute to maintaining anxiety. However, this perception could also be (partly) illusory and detached from actual physiology. This dissociation can be assessed in signal detection tasks using the response bias index. To separate interoceptive sensitivity and response bias, a new paradigm applies signal detection theory, allowing for a clear determination of how accurately patients perceive cardiac events. Heart rate variability (HRV) is examined as a marker for cardiac events.

In a previous study, exposure therapy had no impact on the sensitivity of heartbeat perception in both groups. However, the observed null effect could have been caused by neglecting the distinction between interoceptive sensitivity and response bias. In this context, a liberal response strategy has been proposed as a "better safe than sorry" strategy, which can be associated with various psychopathologies. Exposure therapy could contribute to reducing the disconnected physiology in heartbeat perception, thus decreasing the liberal response bias by altering the evaluation of body sensations. In this study, agoraphobic patients with panic disorder and control patients with social anxiety disorder undergo the two heartbeat perception tasks, wherein the sensitivity of heartbeat perception before and after standardized cognitive-behavioral therapy is examined. Additionally, a healthy control group is compared with these two groups regarding the mentioned parameters.