跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03350984
NCT03350984已完成4 期

Insulin Scheme for Glycemic Control in Non-critical Hospitalized Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in the Context of a Health System in Mexico.

Universidad de Guanajuato1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 75 人开始时间: 2017年11月2日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
已完成
入组人数
75
试验地点
1
主要终点
Differences in the Mean Daily Blood Glucose Between a Basal-bolus Scheme and NPH Schemes of Insulin.

研究概览

简要总结

The aim of the study is to determine differences in glycemic control between a basal-bolus scheme insulin and NPH scheme insulin in a population of hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes in a Noncritical Care Facility in Mexico. Patients with a recent diagnosis of type 2 and patients on treatment with oral hypoglycaemic agents and insulin or only insulin were included.

The primary outcome of the study is to determine difference in efficacy and security between a basal-bolus scheme insulin and NPH scheme insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes hospitalized in non-critical areas in a hospital in Mexico

详细描述

On the first 4 to 6 h, the use of NPH insulin present a pronounced action peak on the postprandial glucose metabolism, and the rest of its basal action last 12 to 18 h, its cover the postprandial requirements of the first two meals of the day (breakfast and lunch) administering 2/3 of the total dose, and the requirements for the dinner with 1/3 of the total dose at the night. This is considered a good scheme for handling hyperglycemia, and its possible to have less hypoglycemia episodes, which are possible if an ultra-rapid-acting insulin is added and adequate intake is not performed due to multiple factors related to hospitalization.

Today it is uncertain whether there is any clear benefit of using Glargine plus Lantus insulin over NPH insulin in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes. Currently, both Glargine and NPH based regimen is practiced in inpatient hospital facilities. Current practice of inpatient insulin regimen is based on the physicians familiarity with a particular insulin type and personal preference rather than evidenced based knowledge. Glargine plus ultrafast insulin are two types of insulin that are more expensive compared to NPH with incidental benefits in hospitalized patients. There are reports in the literature about the incidence of hypoglycemia with this scheme. The current research proposal is to compare these two schemes in the treatment of hospitalized patients with diabetes in a hospital of the second level of care in Mexico.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 100 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients between 18 and 100 years old.
  • History of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) or that upon admission is diagnosed by values of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1) > 6.5%
  • Fasting central glucose before randomization between 140mg/dl and 400mg/dl
  • Non-critical patients hospitalized in the service of Internal Medicine (MI), General Surgery (CG) and Traumatology (TyO).
  • Patients receiving a diabetic diet orally
  • Treated with diet alone, o any combination of oral anti-diabetic agents or insulin treatment with any dosage before admission.

排除标准

  • Parenteral nutrition
  • Hyperglycemia without a known history of diabetes
  • Impaired renal function (glomerular filtration rate less than 30)
  • Diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperosmolar state
  • Type 1 Diabetes mellitus
  • Pregnancy
  • Patients on treatment with more than 10mg prednisone or steroid boluses.
  • Known hypopituitarism or adrenal insufficiency
  • Hyperglycaemia due to stress (negative antecedent of DM2, hyperglycemia and HbA1 <6.5)
  • Severe liver disease (Child-Pugh C score)
  • Acute pancreatitis
  • Patients with sepsis or multiple organ failure
  • Candidates for intensive care unit

研究组 & 干预措施

NPH insulin group

Experimental

Patients receiving NPH twice daily, 2/3 in the morning and 1/3 in the night. A correctional dose of lispro insulin will be given for any blood glucose >180 mg/dL. If subjects were not eating, they shouldn't receive dose of NPH insulin. Intervention Drug: NPH insulin

干预措施: NPH insulin (Drug)

Glargine and Lispro insulin group

Active Comparator

Half of the total of Glargine and Lispro insulin dose will be given as glargine once daily, either in the morning or in the evening, depending on when the patient was enrolled. The other half of the total daily insulin dose will be given as Lispro; doses were divided equally for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. An additional correctional dose of Lispro will be given for any blood glucose >180 mg/dL. If subjects were not eating, they received glargine once daily and they shouldn't receive doses of lispro.

Intervention drug: Glargine and Lispro

干预措施: Glargine and Lispro insulin (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Differences in the Mean Daily Blood Glucose Between a Basal-bolus Scheme and NPH Schemes of Insulin.

时间窗: Fasting blood glucose was taken every day, before breakfast, up to 4 weeks; postprandial glucose was taken every day, 2 hours after breakfast, 2 hours after lunch, and 2 hours after dinner, up to 4 weeks; glucose early morning was taken 3 am, up to 4 week

To determine the differences in the mean daily blood glucose measured in mg/dl, between a basal-bolus scheme and NPH schemes of insulin measured by the mean daily blood glucose.

次要结局

  • Number of Participants With Sustained Glycemic Control During Hospital Stay(blood glucose was taken every day, up to 4 weeks.)
  • the Number of Participants With Mild and Severe Hypoglycemic Events(Duration of hospital stay, up to 4 weeks.)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Jose Antonio de Jesus Alvarez Canales

PhD

Universidad de Guanajuato

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Insulin Schemes for Type 2 Diabetes Control | 临床试验