跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04877925
NCT04877925已完成不适用

Coaxial Drainage Versus Standard Chest Tube After Pulmonary Lobectomy: a Randomized Controlled Study

Marco Anile1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 98 人开始时间: 2017年2月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
98
试验地点
1
主要终点
Daily fluid drainage (mL)

研究概览

简要总结

Objectives: Chest tubes are routinely inserted after thoracic surgery procedures in different size and numbers. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of Smart Drain Coaxial drainage compared with two standard chest tubes in patients undergoing thoracotomy for pulmonary lobectomy. 98 patients (57 males and 41 females, mean age 68.3±7.4 years) with lung cancer undergoing open pulmonary lobectomy were randomized in two groups: 50 received one upper 28-Fr and one lower 32-Fr standard chest tube (ST group) and 48 received one 28-Fr Smart Drain Coaxial tube (CT group). Hospitalization data, quantity of fluid output, air leaks, radiograph findings, pain control and costs were assessed.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • age more than 18 years
  • patients scheduled for pulmonary lobectomy

排除标准

  • middle lobectomy,
  • extended resections, minimally invasive lobectomies,
  • previous ipsilateral thoracic surgery,
  • induction chemo and/or radiotherapy
  • patients who did not give consent to participate.

结局指标

主要结局

Daily fluid drainage (mL)

时间窗: 1 postoperative day

Quality of fluid drainage evaluated in mL and by means of a chest X rays

Presence of postoperative pneumothorax

时间窗: 1 postoperative day

Quality of air drainage evaluated by chest X rays

次要结局

  • presence of pneumothorax after tubes removal(within 24 hours after tubes removal)
  • evaluation of pain measured by Visual Analogue Scale(1 postoperative day)
  • Analysis of costs (in euros)(until discharge, an average of 6 days)
  • Postoperative hospitalization (in days)(until discharge, an average of 6 days)

研究者

发起方
Marco Anile
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor Investigator
主要研究者

Marco Anile

Principal Investigator

University of Roma La Sapienza

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验