Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03056716
NCT03056716CompletedNot Applicable

Silastic Versus Conventional Drain for Postoperative Drainage in Thoracic Surgery.

T.C. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi2 sites in 1 country118 target enrollmentStarted: June 1, 2009Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
118
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Duration of hospital stay

Study Overview

Brief Summary

In thoracic surgery, it is usual to place apical and basal drains for complete drainage of air and fluid out of the pleural cavity. The routinely used drains are mainly made of plastic. Recently silastic drains of smaller size are used without any complication. The investigators designed a prospective randomized trial to compare the draining properties of the two types of drains following various resections in thoracic surgery.

Detailed Description

Following the Institutional Review Board permission (permission no: 2009/27) the investigators started to recruit patients for the study in June 2009. Pneumonectomy, decortication, and diaphragm plication patients were not included in this study. The patients were consecutively placed in one of the two groups. In Group I, an apical 28FR size CD, and a basal 19FR SD were placed following surgery. In Group II, the apical drain was 28FR, and the basal drain was 32FR CDs. Basal drains were removed out when daily serous fluid drainage became 200 ml or less, and the apical were removed 48-72 hours following the cessation of air leak. The patients were discharged on the day after drain removal. The data concerning gender, age, diagnosis, operation side, type of operation, amount of fluid drainage, duration of fluid and air drainage, length of hospital stay, and complications if any, were noted.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
16 Years to — (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Candidates of surgery willing to participate in the experimental arm of the study and signing the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Pneumonectomy, diaphragm plication, and decortication candidates

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Duration of hospital stay

Time Frame: 3 years

Duration of hospital stay will be noted on the study datasheet and will be measured in days.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Daily amount of fluid drainage(3 years)
  • Duration of fluid drainage(3 years)
  • Duration of air leak(3 years)

Investigators

Sponsor
T.C. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Serhat Yalcinkaya,MD

Assist. Prof. of Thoracic Surgery

T.C. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials