跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05230420
NCT05230420Unknown不适用

Urine Bag Usage Versus Chest Drain Clamping After Lung Resection Surgeries

Al-Quds University4 个研究点 分布在 3 个国家目标入组 160 人开始时间: 2022年1月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
160
试验地点
4
主要终点
Overall cost

研究概览

简要总结

Investigators will compare two different approaches of postoperative drainage after the standard water-seal drain has been used efficiently; one is by using urine bag and check it get blown by the leaked air, two is by using clamping of the water seal drain. Investigators will compare them depending on several factors such as; cost effectiveness, hospital stay, duration of putting the drain and more, reinsertion of the chest tube and others.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • post lung resection patients (via Uniportal VATS only)
  • Over the age of 18
  • indicated chest tube

排除标准

  • Under the age of 18

结局指标

主要结局

Overall cost

时间窗: 5 to 6 days

The overall cost of the patient's hospital stay

次要结局

  • Number of participants with chest tube re-insertion(up to 5 days)
  • total number of days with chest drain inserted(up to 5 days)
  • Number of participants with re-accumulation of air after chest tube clamping or attachment to the urine bag(up to 5 days)
  • Number of chest x-rays(up to 5 days)
  • Number of participants that faced other intervention associated side effects(up to 5 days)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (4)

Loading locations...

相似试验