Urine Bag Usage Versus Chest Drain Clamping After Lung Resection Surgeries
- Conditions
- Pneumothorax and Air LeakPneumothoraxPleura InjuryPleural Effusion
- Registration Number
- NCT05230420
- Lead Sponsor
- Al-Quds University
- Brief Summary
Investigators will compare two different approaches of postoperative drainage after the standard water-seal drain has been used efficiently; one is by using urine bag and check it get blown by the leaked air, two is by using clamping of the water seal drain. Investigators will compare them depending on several factors such as; cost effectiveness, hospital stay, duration of putting the drain and more, reinsertion of the chest tube and others.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 160
- post lung resection patients (via Uniportal VATS only)
- Over the age of 18
- indicated chest tube
- Under the age of 18
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Overall cost 5 to 6 days The overall cost of the patient's hospital stay
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of participants with chest tube re-insertion up to 5 days An important side effect
total number of days with chest drain inserted up to 5 days Number of days chest drain remained inserted
Number of participants with re-accumulation of air after chest tube clamping or attachment to the urine bag up to 5 days An important side effect to be studied
Number of chest x-rays up to 5 days Total number of chest x-rays
Number of participants that faced other intervention associated side effects up to 5 days Subcutaneous emphysema, tension pneumothorax and others
Trial Locations
- Locations (4)
Assiut University
🇪🇬Assiut, Egypt
Tanta University
🇪🇬Tanta, Egypt
European Institute of Oncology
🇮🇹Milan, Italy
Makassed Hospital
🇵🇸Jérusalem-Est, Palestinian Territory, occupied
Assiut University🇪🇬Assiut, EgyptHussein Elkhayat, MDContactdr_khayat@hotmail.com