跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01227967
NCT01227967已完成2 期

A Randomized Double-Blind Phase 2 Study Comparing the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Combination Antivirals (Amantadine, Ribavirin, Oseltamivir) Versus Oseltamivir for the Treatment of Influenza in Adults at Risk for Complications

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)91 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 881 人开始时间: 2010年9月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
2 期
状态
已完成
入组人数
881
试验地点
91
主要终点
Percentage of Participants With Virus Detectable by Quantitative PCR (qPCR) in Nasopharyngeal (NP) Swabs

研究概览

简要总结

Seasonal influenza is responsible for many hospitalizations and deaths each year, despite effective antiviral treatments. Some individuals have medical conditions such as heart or lung diseases that make them particularly at risk of severe influenza infections that may result in hospitalization or death. Oseltamivir (Tamiflu) is used most often to treat flu, but there are still many hospitalizations, complications, and deaths even with treatment. This study evaluated the use of combination antivirals (amantadine, oseltamivir, and ribavirin) compared to oseltamivir alone in the treatment of influenza in an at-risk population.

详细描述

Seasonal influenza is responsible for approximately 226,000 excess hospitalizations annually and despite effective antivirals causes significant morbidity and mortality (estimated 24,000-50,000 deaths each year in the United States alone). The influenza virus that emerged in 2009 (A/California/07/2009 H1N1) caused fewer deaths (12,000 flu-related deaths in the U.S) but in contrast to seasonal flu, nearly 90 percent of the deaths with the 2009 H1N1 occurred among people younger than 65 years of age. The CDC has defined an at-risk population that accounts for the majority of hospitalization and morbidity associated with influenza. This study evaluated the use of combination antivirals as compared to oseltamivir alone in the treatment of influenza in an at-risk population.

Subjects who met the CDC definition for being at-risk and that present with an influenza-like illness were screened for the study. Those subjects with a confirmatory test for influenza (rapid antigen or PCR) were randomized in a 1:1 manner to receive a blinded study treatment consisting of either the combination of amantadine, oseltamivir, and ribavirin or oseltamivir alone for 5 days. Clinical, virologic, and laboratory assessments on Days 1, 3, 7, 14, and 28 were used for both safety and efficacy analysis.

Design:

  • Participants were screened with a physical examination and medical history, along with blood tests and throat swabs to confirm influenza infection.
  • Eligible participants were randomly assigned to take either oseltamivir alone (the current standard treatment for influenza) or to take oseltamivir, amantadine, and ribavirin. Participants had additional blood samples and throat swabs taken at the start of the study, and were shown how to complete a study diary at home.
  • Participants received a study medication kit containing the medication to take at home twice a day for 5 days.
  • Participants returned, with the medication kit, to the clinic on days 1 (the first day after the start of the study), 3, 7, 14, and 28. The first visit took 2 to 3 hours, but each subsequent visit took approximately 1 to 2 hours. Additional blood samples and throat swabs were taken at these visits.

Pilot study:

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Investigator)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • 未提供

研究组 & 干预措施

Combination Therapy

Experimental

Amantadine, Ribavirin, Oseltamivir

干预措施: Amantadine, Ribavirin, Oseltamivir (Drug)

Oseltamivir monotherapy

Active Comparator

Oseltamivir

干预措施: Oseltamivir (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Percentage of Participants With Virus Detectable by Quantitative PCR (qPCR) in Nasopharyngeal (NP) Swabs

时间窗: At Day 3

The central laboratory performed a qualitative PCR test on the NP sample from Day 0 in order to confirm influenza infection and to determine the influenza type and subtype. For participants with a positive influenza test result at Day 0 from this qualitative PCR testing, the laboratory then performed qPCR testing of subsequent samples to quantify viral shedding.

次要结局

  • Time to Alleviation of Influenza Clinical Symptoms.(From treatment initiation to Day 28)
  • Number of Participants by Virus Detection Status(At Day 0, 3 and 7.)
  • qPCR Viral Shedding(At Day 0, 3 and 7)
  • Percentage of Participants With Clinical Failure at Day 5(From treatment initiation to Day 28)
  • Number of Participants Shedding Virus(At day 3 and 7.)
  • Time to Feeling as Good as Before the Onset of the Influenza Illness(From treatment initiation to Day 28)
  • Percentage of Participants Who Develop Bronchitis, Pneumonia, or Other Complications of Influenza After Day 0.(From treatment initiation to Day 28)
  • Time to Absence of Fever(From treatment initiation to Day 28)
  • Time to Resolution of All Symptoms AND Fever(From treatment initiation to Day 28)
  • Time to Return to Pre-influenza Function(From treatment initiation to Day 28)
  • Percentage of Participants Who Required New or Increased Use of Supplemental Oxygen(From treatment initiation to Day 28)
  • 28-day Mortality(From treatment initiation to Day 28)
  • Time to Return of Physical Function to Pre-illness Leve(From treatment initiation to Day 28)
  • Percentage of Participants Who Required Hospitalization.(From treatment initiation to Day 28)

研究者

申办方类型
Nih
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (91)

Loading locations...

相似试验