跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01313052
NCT01313052已完成3 期

Forensic Assertive Community Treatment: An Emerging Model of Service Delivery

University of Rochester2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 53 人开始时间: 2008年5月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
3 期
状态
已完成
入组人数
53
试验地点
2
主要终点
Jail Recidivism

研究概览

简要总结

The FACT model (ACT + legal leverage in the form of judicial monitoring) will be compared to enhanced outpatient treatment (close outpatient follow-up without judicial monitoring). Seventy adults with psychotic disorders in Monroe County who are convicted of a misdemeanor will be randomly assigned to each treatment group and followed for 12 months. Primary outcomes will include criminal justice and mental health service utilization rates, treatment adherence, psychiatric symptoms, substance abuse, homelessness, perceived coercion, and consumer satisfaction. Service utilization outcomes will be tracked using established mental health and criminal justice databases.

Hypotheses are:

  1. FACT (ACT plus judicial monitoring) will have a greater effect than enhanced TAU in promoting treatment adherence among high-risk adults with psychotic disorders.
  2. FACT (ACT plus judicial monitoring) will have a greater effect than enhanced TAU in preventing arrest, incarceration, emergency department and inpatient hospital use among high-risk adults with psychotic disorders.

详细描述

FACT (Forensic Assertive Community Treatment) is an adaptation of the Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) model that addresses a significant gap in our service delivery systems by targeting the interface between mental health and criminal justice services. ACT was originally developed to engage severely mentally ill adults in outpatient psychiatric treatment through the use of assertive outreach and comprehensive services. FACT adds legal leverage in the form of judicial monitoring to ACT, which is comprehensive, high intensity, mobile, psychiatric treatment.

The FACT model (ACT + legal leverage in the form of judicial monitoring) will be compared to enhanced outpatient treatment (close outpatient follow-up without judicial monitoring). Seventy adults with psychotic disorders in Monroe County who are convicted of a misdemeanor will be randomly assigned to each treatment group and followed for 12 months. Primary outcomes will include criminal justice and mental health service utilization rates, treatment adherence, psychiatric symptoms, substance abuse, and homelessness. Service utilization outcomes will be tracked using established mental health and criminal justice databases.

Hypotheses are:

  1. FACT (ACT plus judicial monitoring) will have a greater effect than enhanced TAU in promoting treatment adherence among high-risk adults with psychotic disorders.
  2. FACT (ACT plus judicial monitoring) will have a greater effect than enhanced TAU in preventing arrest, incarceration, emergency department and inpatient hospital use among high-risk adults with psychotic disorders.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Individuals diagnosed with any psychotic disorder such as Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Disorder with Psychotic Features, Depressive Disorder with Psychotic Features, and Psychotic Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified.
  • Individuals currently facing misdemeanor or violation charges who have not yet been sentenced.

排除标准

  • Individuals do not have or cannot be diagnosed with a psychotic disorder.
  • Individuals currently facing felony charges
  • Individuals currently involved in any type of legal leverage including probation, parole, drug or mental health court supervision, Assisted Outpatient Treatment, or Criminal Procedure Law status.

结局指标

主要结局

Jail Recidivism

时间窗: For the one year subjects are in the study.

The study will measure number of arrests, number of incarcerations, and total number of jail and/or prison days in the time frame described above.

Mental Health Service Utilization

时间窗: For the one year subjects are in the study.

The study will measure number of hospitalizations, number of hospital days, number of emergency room visits, number of outpatient mental health visits as primary outcome measures, and treatment appointment adherence.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Steven Lamberti

Professor, Department of Psychiatry

University of Rochester

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验