跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05746052
NCT05746052已完成不适用

Microneedling Versus Punch Elevation With Microneedling in Treatment of Atrophic Acne Scars: Comparative Study

Al-Azhar University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 15 人开始时间: 2021年4月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
15
试验地点
2
主要终点
change in acne scars

研究概览

简要总结

The ultimate goal of this study was to compare punch elevation and micro needling with PRP versus micro needling and PRP only in treatment of post acne scars, in an attempt to achieve better management of such condition.

This is a prospective study that was carried out on 15 patients (their ages ranged from 19 to 32 years with a mean of 23 years. They are 6 males and 7 females, 7 patients were of skin photo type III, and 10 were rural residents), they presented with post acne facial scars, and attending the Dermatology and Andrology outpatient clinic of Al-Azhar University Hospital in (Assiut), between April 2021 and March 2022. Left side of face of the lesion of each patient will be treated by punch elevation two weeks before microneeedling with platlets rich plasma (PRP),the right side will be treated by microneedling with (PRP) only from the start, three sessions of microneedling will be done with 4 weeks interval.

Each patient had punch elevation for scars in left side at first session then dressing removed after 7 days after three weeks all patents received treatment on both sides of the face by micro needling with PRP.

During each session, topical anesthesia was applied over the area of interest on face and removed after 20 mints. Patients were placed in supine position with head stable, the skin was stretched and micro needling was carried out in vertical, horizontal and both diagonal directions for about 4-5 times. PRP (2 ml) were applied on the face. A total of three sessions of microneedling were performed at monthly intervals.

Follow-up of the patients was done before and after treatment by clinical examination and photography by comparing the photographs before and after therapy; Evolution of clinical response included extent of improvement and possible adverse effects including bleeding, and erythema. And PIH Clinical photos of the lesions had been taken before the first session and one month after the last session and assessed clinically to grade the severity of scarring proposed by Goodman and Baron's quantitative scale for acne scars at the baseline and the end of study. Patients' satisfaction had been done by using a quartile grading system (1 poorly satisfied, 2 satisfied or 3 very satisfied).

As regard efficacy of the procedures, we found significant improvement of atrophic acne scars, with significant reduction in number of acne scars as well as significant reduction in goodman score after treatment by punch elevation and micro needling with PRP, most of patients were satisfied after treatment, the side treated with punch elevation have statistically significant reduction in the number of the scar when compared to the right side.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 40 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients of both genders. Patients with Ice pick and box scars of any duration. Co-operative patients and patients are willing for the procedure. Patients of age 18 - 40 years

排除标准

  • Presence of active acne lesions. Patients with active infection at the local site or recurrent herpes. Patients with history of bleeding disorders or anticoagulant medications Patients with keloid scarring or hypertrophic scar. patients with recurrent herpes simplex infection

结局指标

主要结局

change in acne scars

时间窗: 4 weeks following end of treatment

Goodman and Baron's quantitative acne scar grading system

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Mohamed Mahmoud Mohamed Mahmoud

MSc researcher

Al-Azhar University

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验