Progesterone Support for Frozen Embryo Transfer: Intramuscular Versus Vaginal Suppository - A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 57
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Clinical Pregnancy Rate
研究概览
简要总结
There have been two very common forms of progesterone administration that have been used during ovulation induction, in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfers. There are currently no randomized clinical trials to demonstrate which method of progesterone administration is more effective for frozen embryo transfer. We raise the question: Is there a difference between the two accepted methods of progesterone administration, intramuscular and vaginal suppositories, for frozen embryo transfer? Studies for fresh embryo transfer after in vitro fertilization, have demonstrated that there is not a difference between the two methods of progesterone administration. We will evaluate the question for frozen embryo transfer.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 20 Years 至 50 Years(Adult)
- 性别
- Female
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Females < 50 years of age
- •Having frozen embryo transfer at Mayo Clinic
- •Embryos have been created prior to age 42
- •Willing to be randomized to either method of progesterone administration
排除标准
- •Diagnosis of severe medical illness
- •Uterine lesions affecting the cavity or endometrium
- •Uterine anomaly
- •Presence of hydrosalpinx
- •Extreme difficulty with embryo transfer
研究组 & 干预措施
Progesterone Vaginal Suppositories
干预措施: Progesterone Vaginal Suppositories (Drug)
Intramuscular Progesterone-in-Oil
干预措施: Intramuscular Progesterone-in-Oil (Drug)
结局指标
主要结局
Clinical Pregnancy Rate
时间窗: 3 years
次要结局
- Implantation rate(3 years)
研究者
Charles Coddington
Charles C. Coddington MD
Mayo Clinic
