Effects of FMS Functional Movement Training on Body Posture Control in College Female Aerobics Athletes

Randomized into: Control, Traditional physical training Group, T, N = 20 , Intervention, Functional training Group, F, N = 20). The control group used traditional physical training methods, and the experimental group used FMS-based functional movement training methods. A 12-week functional movement training program was used and the experimental group was given intervention training 4 times a week for 40 min each time, and FMS scores, body posture control, and athletic performance were tested before and after the intervention. It was expected that the main assessment criteria would include the seven movements of the FMS Functional Movement Test (deep squat, hurdle step, lunge squat, shoulder flexibility, active straight leg raise, trunk stability push-up, and trunk rotational stability) as well as dynamic and static body postural control in aerobics movements. Tests of T-run and basic pace Y-jump time and athletic performance were used as secondary outcomes. The main tools included: a set of FMS tester, a roll of yellow tape, a measuring tape, a stopwatch, and a test chart for each index.

The test was divided into two phases. Phase 1: corrective training (1-4 weeks), Phase 2 is: the overall movement (functional patterning) 5-12 weeks, while the design concept of the program is shown in the increase of difficulty, specialization, but also includes the process of static stability to dynamic stability, and then finally, the overall movement pattern training. Tools used: balance disk, Swiss ball, solid ball, foam shaft, massage stick.