Comparative Study Between Dural Puncture Epidural Technique Versus Conventional Epidural Technique During Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 50
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- incidence of bilateral sacral blockade
研究概览
简要总结
This study will be conducted on 50 patients of ASA grade I and II aged from 25 to 55 years and presented for laparoscopic hysterectomy. Patients will be divided into two equal groups; group A control group for conventional epidural technique(n=25) and group B for 25G dural puncture epidural with 25G pencil point Whitacre spinal needle (n=25). Randomization will be done using computer generated number and concealed using sequentially numbered, sealed opaque envelope.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Supportive Care
- 盲法
- Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 25 Years 至 55 Years（Adult）
- 性别
- Female
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •ASA I and II
- •Height(150-170 cm)
排除标准
- •patient refusal
- •hypersensitivity to local anesthetic drugs
- •bleeding disorders and coagulopathy(platelets count less than 80000,INR less than 1.5 or therapeutic dose of anticoagulant).
研究组 & 干预措施
Conventional Epidural Technique
干预措施: Dural Puncture Epidural Technique using pencil-point 25G Whitacre needle (Procedure)
Dural Puncture Epidural technique using pencil-point 25G Whitacre needle
干预措施: Conventional Epidural Technique (Procedure)
结局指标
主要结局
incidence of bilateral sacral blockade
时间窗: Up to 30 minutes after local anesthetic injection
Sensory blockade was evaluated using a non-traumatic pinprick stimulus starting at the S2 dermatome and moving in a caudad direction (measured every 2 minutes)
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Reham Ali Abdelhaleem Abdelrahman
Anesthesia lecturer M.D.
Cairo University