Immersive Virtual Reality Versus Mannequin-based Simulation Training for Trauma Resuscitation: a Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 38
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Trauma Score
研究概览
简要总结
This study individual training with an immersive virtual reality Trauma Simulator was compared to live mannequin-based simulation training in a facilitated group. The results showed that virtual reality simulator led to non-inferior effects on trauma resuscitation skills to mannequin-based simulation. Trauma Simulator had good usability, was well received by the participants, and had minimal adverse effects.
详细描述
Background: Despite its high potential, the effect of immersive virtual reality simulation (VRS) in trauma resuscitation training has not been studied. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that VRS is non-inferior to mannequin-based simulation (MBS) in trauma resuscitation training.
Methods: In a single-center, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial, we compared individual training with an immersive virtual reality Trauma Simulator to live MBS training in a facilitated group. The primary outcome was the Trauma Score (ranging from 55 (worse) to 177 (best outcome)) during the MBS assessment. The secondary outcomes were the Trauma Score VRS assessment, System Usability Scale (ranging from 0 (worse) -100 (best outcome)), and Simulation Sickness Questionnaire (ranging from 0 (worse) to 235.62 (best outcome)).
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Crossover
- 主要目的
- Other
- 盲法
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
盲法说明
All assessments of the student performances were recorded either by video camera (mannequin based simulation) or screen capture (virtual reality simulation). All videos were assessed by two blinded raters independently. In order to maintain consistency, virtual reality recordings were also scored manually by the raters, instead of the automated Trauma Simulator built-in tool. The video data were stored for the reviews and deleted afterwards.
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •fluency in English.
排除标准
- •history of motion sickness
结局指标
主要结局
Trauma Score
时间窗: Within a Day
The primary outcome of the study is Trauma Score (range 55 (worst) to 177(best outcome) during an individual assessment in a mannequin-based simulation environment. The assessment was based on the video recordings analyzing students during performing in the scenario. The Trauma Score is an assessment tool developed by military emergency medicine experts for the Trauma Simulator.
次要结局
- Trauma Score in VRS(Within a VR session (less than 10minutes per person))
- Pre- and Post-Surveys(Within a Day)
研究者
Ainars Stepens
Lead researcher in Institute of Public Health
Riga Stradins University