CTRI/2023/09/057204尚未招募Unknown
Comparison of conventional blind method and rotational manoeuvre of nasogastric tube insertion in anaesthetised intubated patients - A randomised controlled trial
Kauvery hospitals0 个研究点目标入组 0 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:
试验速览
- 阶段
- Unknown
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
入选标准
- •Posted for surgery under general anaesthesia and requires nasogastric tube insertion.
排除标准
- •Altered coagulation parameters, not willing to participate in study, base of skull fractures and facial bone fractures, growth in pharynx or oesophagus
研究者
相似试验
已完成
不适用
Comparison of Blind technique with under Vision technique of placement of airway tubes(LMA) in children.CTRI/2019/02/017644nil75
已完成
不适用
Impact of the traditional blind technique versus the novel ultrasound guided technique for office fitting of intra-uterine contraceptive devices on success of insertion, time required and patient satisfaction in healthy women with regular menstrual periodsFertility controlReproductive Health and Childbirth - ContraceptionACTRN12615000526572Mervat Sheikhelarab Elsedeek100
招募中
不适用
Comparison of conventional rotating method and non-rotating method for double-lumen tube insertion for one lung ventilation: A Randomized Clinical TrialDiseases of the respiratory systemKCT0005188Chungnam National University Hospital90
已完成
不适用
The effect of four different blind techniques of i-gel insertion on device position and performance in pediatric patientsCTRI/2020/09/027606Priya Priyadarshi132
尚未招募
1 期
comparison of two techniques of BASKA mask ,straight versus rotationalCTRI/2019/05/018922A