The Effect of Two Different Tourniquet Techniques on Peripheral IV Access Success Rates
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- Mayo Clinic
- 入组人数
- 121
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Peripheral IV Access Success Rate
研究概览
简要总结
The purpose of this study is to compare the success rates of two different tourniquets that are used when placing an IV.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Basic Science
- 盲法
- Single (Care Provider)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Emergency Department patients
- •18 years old or older
- •who receive peripheral IV access
排除标准
- •Patients under the age of 18
- •prison inmates
- •pregnant patients
- •patients who are unable to give informed consent
- •critically ill patients who need emergent IV access as defined by the Emergency Medicine consultant of record for the patient
研究组 & 干预措施
disposable elastic tourniquet
干预措施: disposable elastic tourniquet (Device)
manual blood pressure cuff
manual blood pressure cuff inflated to 150 milliliters mercury (mmHg)
干预措施: blood pressure cuff (Device)
结局指标
主要结局
Peripheral IV Access Success Rate
时间窗: baseline
Peripheral IV access success rate is defined as the number of subjects who had successful peripheral intravenous cannulation on the first attempt. An attempt was defined as a needle penetrating the surface of the subject's skin. Successful access was defined as good flow through an IV catheter with a saline flush and without subcutaneous fluid collection.
次要结局
- Total Number of Distinct Providers That Attempted IV Access(baseline)
- Total Number of Peripheral IV Access Attempts(baseline)
- Rate of Rescue Techniques Used(baseline)
研究者
Tobias Kummer
Assistant Professor of Emergency Medicine
Mayo Clinic
