A Comparison of Two Models for Transition of Adolescents and Young Adults With Diabetes From Pediatric to Adult Care
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 28
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Measure and compare change in self-efficacy and change in diabetes knowledge, diabetes quality of life, family conflict, and treatment satisfaction for and between the two groups.
研究概览
简要总结
The purpose of the study is to compare two interventions for preparing diabetic teens and young adults for transition from pediatric to adult diabetes care.
详细描述
One will represent a short-term intensive social-behavioral intervention supported by peer-to-peer social networking in which subjects receive "usual care" from their current diabetes provider outside the parameters of the study. The second intervention will be a traditional transition clinic model, where subjects will receive the standard of diabetes care from a team of combined pediatric and adult practitioners and educators, with added educational modules and behavioral evaluation and support designed to facilitate the transition to adult care (i.e., that foster "developmentally tailored care"). The first is a much less intensive intervention from the standpoint of the providers and gives special prominence to peer support; the second is provider-intensive. The goal of both interventions is to improve self-efficacy (confidence in taking ownership of and managing one's diabetes); i.e., to prepare the patient to move from primary support by family and providers to a reliance on self-ownership and self-management as a responsible, independent adult.
Optional sub-study available for parents, spouses, and significant others.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Non Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 16 Years 至 29 Years（Child, Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Age 16-29
- •Diagnosis of type 1 diabetes, or type 2 diabetes managed with insulin, at least one year prior to study initiation
- •English-speaking
- •Some form of private or public (e.g., Medicaid) health insurance
排除标准
- •Cystic fibrosis-related or pancreatitis-related diabetes
- •Diabetes related to a known specific genetic defect such as Down's Syndrome, Lipoatrophic Diabetes, Leprechaunism or Rabson-Mendenhall Syndrome, etc.
- •Chronic liver disease
- •History of chronic renal failure
- •Serious psychiatric illness that in the judgment of the investigators would preclude the individual's ability to complete the study
- •Pregnant or planning to become pregnant within 6 months
结局指标
主要结局
Measure and compare change in self-efficacy and change in diabetes knowledge, diabetes quality of life, family conflict, and treatment satisfaction for and between the two groups.
时间窗: 6 months and 12 months
次要结局
- Make exploratory baseline comparisons between the two groups regarding locus of diabetes care (kind of provider), comparing numbers of subjects in each group who made a successful transition to adult care(6 months and 12 months)
- Make exploratory baseline comparisons between the two groups of using some form of social networking by the two groups as an adjunt of diabetes care.(6 months and 12 months)
- Make exploratory baseline comparisons between the two groups regarding provider and educator time devoted in each arm of the intervention (in order to prepare for a robust comparative effectiveness analysis in a subsequent study).(6 months)
- Make exploratory baseline comparisons between the two groups of HgbA1c(6 months and 12 months)