CTRI/2020/07/026636尚未招募未知
A comparative study on ease of insertion of laryngeal mask airway; intravenous lignocaine v/s topical lignocaine
Dr Catharine Anto0 个研究点目标入组 0 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:
试验速览
- 阶段
- 未知
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
入选标准
- •1.consenting adults aged 20 to 50 years for whom LMA is the airway of choice.
- •2.adults belonging to either sex with ASA grade 1 or 2
排除标准
- •1.patients with ASA grade 3 or more
- •2.pregnant women
- •3.obese patients (BMI more than 30)
- •4.patients with risk of aspiration
研究者
相似试验
招募中
不适用
Comparison of two anaesthetic inducing drugs i.e. (propofol) & (thiopentone with 10% lignocaine spray) for the study of ease of insertion of laryngeal mask airway.CTRI/2016/09/007239M G M MEDICAL COLLEGE AND M Y HOSPITAL INDORE80
尚未招募
2 期
Comparison of lma supreme with classic using low dose of muscle relaxantCTRI/2024/03/064891Guru Gobind singh medical College hospital
尚未招募
3 期
Comparison of laryngeal mask airway Supreme with laryngeal mask airway Classic using low-dose of the muscle relaxants.CTRI/2024/02/062183Dr Sarvjeet Kaur
尚未招募
2 期
THE STUDY OF INSERTION TECHNIQUES OF LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY- SUPREMECTRI/2020/12/029490Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences Karad
尚未招募
不适用
Comparison of Classic-LMA vs I-gel Supraglottic Airway DeviceCTRI/2020/06/025683SMS Medical College Jaipur