Group-based Cardiac Telerehabilitation and Its Effectiveness
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 招募中
- 入组人数
- 198
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Change from Baseline in Health and Well- being at 12 Months
研究概览
简要总结
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and coronary artery diseases (CAD) are the most common cause of death worldwide. After an acute cardiac event, prevention of new cardiac events is essential and reduces suffering. Group-based cardiac telerehabilitation (CTR) refers to the use of information and communication technologies for rehabilitation purposes in promoting CAD patients´ health.
详细描述
This study aims to assess the group-based cardiac telerehabilitation model and its effectiveness. The data is collected from two University hospitals in Finland. Patients with coronary heart disease two months after percutaneous coronary intervention (N=198) are invited to the study. All the participants are being treated in a healthcare unit that uses digital care pathways for coronary patients. Patients can choose the usual care or group-based cardiac telerehabilitation as follow-up care. All the patients are invited to the study after the chosen follow-up care (telerehabilitation or usual care). Patients will be allocated into two groups: The telerehabilitation group is the intervention group and the usual care group is the control group. Quality of life, adherence to treatment, and lifestyle changes are measured at the baseline and 3, 6, and 12 after the intervention baseline.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Non Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
盲法说明
All the participants are being treated in a healthcare unit that uses digital care pathways for coronary patients. Patients can choose the usual care or group-based cardiac telerehabilitation as follow-up care. All the patients are invited to the study after the chosen follow-up care (telerehabilitation or usual care)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 100 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Participants must have patients with coronary heart disease two months after percutaneous coronary intervention.
- •Participants must have ≥18 years of age, and ≤100 years of age
- •Participants are being treated in a healthcare unit that uses digital care pathways for coronary patients.
排除标准
- •Participants must not have coronary artery disease diagnosed.
- •Participants have been in other operations than percutaneous coronary intervention.
结局指标
主要结局
Change from Baseline in Health and Well- being at 12 Months
时间窗: Baseline and 12 Months
Health and well-being - the instrument is a generic, self-administered instrument. The questionnaire contains items on the factors influencing health and well-being (smoking, use of alcohol, eating habits, physical activity, sleep), which are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ('definitely disagree' to 'definitely agree').
Change from Baseline in The health-related quality of life at 12 Months
时间窗: Baseline and 12 Months
15D The health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument is a generic, comprehensive (15-dimensional), self-administered instrument for adults (age 16+ years). It combines the advantages of a profile and a preference-based, single index measure. A set of utility or preference weights is used to generate the 15D score (single index number) on a 0-1 scale, representing the overall HRQoL (0 = being dead, 0.0162 = being unconscious or comatose, 1 = no problems on any dimension = 'full' HRQOL). Change = (Month 12 score- Baseline score).
Change from Baseline in The Adherence to Treatment at 12 Months
时间窗: Baseline and 12 Months
Adherence to Treatment is a self-assessment instrument designed to describe adherence to treatment of long-term conditions. The questionnaire contains 38 items of adherence to treatment, which are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ('definitely disagree' to 'definitely agree').
Change from Baseline in The Adherence to Medication at 12 Months
时间窗: Baseline and 12 Months
Adherence to Medication- instrument is a generic, self-administered instrument. The questionnaire contains items of adherence to medication, which are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ('definitely disagree' to 'definitely agree').
次要结局
未报告次要终点