跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07533877
NCT07533877已完成不适用

Testing Adding Ultra-processed Warning Labels in the FDA Nutrition Info Box, a Randomized Online Experiment in Adults in the United States

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 7,000 人开始时间: 2026年4月13日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
7,000
试验地点
1
主要终点
Purchase Intent

研究概览

简要总结

This randomized controlled online experiment will test whether adding an ultra-processed food (UPF) warning label to the FDA's proposed Nutrition Information Box (NIB) changes consumer perceptions of UPFs among a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults.

Participants will be randomized to one of four label conditions and will evaluate four UPF yogurt products with different nutritional profiles on the NIB. The primary outcome is purchase intent and the secondary outcomes are perceived healthfulness, perceived usefulness and correct identification of UPF products.

This experiment aims to answer the following questions:

Do UPF warning labels reduce purchase intentions compared to the NIB alone? Do UPF warning labels reduce perceived healthfulness compared to the NIB alone? Do UPF warning labels help more consumers correctly identify products as ultra-processed compared to the NIB alone? Do different UPF warning label color designs differ in effectiveness at reducing purchase intentions, lowering perceived healthfulness, and improving correct identification of UPFs?

Researchers will compare outcomes across the four randomized arms to estimate the independent effect of adding UPF warnings beyond nutrient disclosure in the NIB alone.

详细描述

Four-arm parallel randomized controlled trial (RCT) in a nationally representative online survey. Participants (n≈7,000) will view identical product images with different UPFWL: NIB only Control, NIB + UPF label Yellow, NIB + UPF label Red, NIB + UPF label Black.

Between-subjects design. Each participant will see one label condition across four products (presented in a random order). Outcomes will be measured via Likert scales and binary classification. Randomization implemented in Qualtrics with simple equal allocation. After viewing each product participants will answer questions about the intention to purchase the product, how healthy the participant thinks the product is, and whether or not the product is a UPF. After presentation of the 4 products, the label will be displayed again and participants will answer questions about how useful the participant thinks the label is for making decisions about how well a food fits into a healthy diet.

The investigators hypothesize that all UPF warning labels (UPFWL) will be more effective than the Nutrition Information Box (NIB) alone, with the red UPF warning label being the most effective, followed by the yellow label, and the black label being the least effective at reducing purchase intention, lowering perceived healthfulness, increasing perceived usefulness, and improving correct identification of ultra-processed products.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 18 years of age or older
  • Member of the Verasight Panel
  • Residing in the United States

排除标准

  • <18 years of age
  • Not residing in the United States
  • Completed the survey in less than one-third of the median completion duration of all participants
  • Respondents with high refusal rates (skipped or refused more than 50% of questions)
  • Respondents who 'straight-line' all question grids with 6 or more items, where responses are not internally consistent

研究组 & 干预措施

NIB + UPFWL 2

Experimental

NIB + UPF Warning Label Red

干预措施: Label exposure in mock-up UPF products (Behavioral)

NIB + UPFWL 3

Experimental

NIB + UPF Warning Label Black

干预措施: Label exposure in mock-up UPF products (Behavioral)

Control

Active Comparator

NIB only

干预措施: Label exposure in mock-up UPF products (Behavioral)

NIB + UPFWL 1

Experimental

NIB + UPF Warning Label Yellow

干预措施: Label exposure in mock-up UPF products (Behavioral)

结局指标

主要结局

Purchase Intent

时间窗: Immediately after label exposure

Likelihood of purchasing each product measured on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 = "Very unlikely" to 5 = "Very likely" indicating how likely the participant would be to buy the product in the next week if it were available in a store. Higher scores indicate greater purchase intent.

次要结局

  • Correct Identification of UPF(Immediately after label exposure)
  • Perceived Healthfulness(Immediately after label exposure)
  • Perceived Usefulness(Immediately after label exposure)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验