跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05181358
NCT05181358已完成不适用

Evaluation of the Relationship Between Different Postoperative Analgesia Techniques and Post-cesarean Quality of Recovery; Prospective Observational Study

Konya Meram State Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 180 人开始时间: 2022年1月24日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
180
试验地点
1
主要终点
Obstetric Quality of Recovery

研究概览

简要总结

The question remains whether the patients in whom USG-guided regional anesthesia and analgesia techniques are applied have a better recovery score than subarachnoid morphine administration, which is considered the gold standard. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of recovery score using the Obstetric Recovery Quality Score-ObsQoR-10 questionnaire experienced by the patients who underwent elective cesarean section and compare the results of different regional anesthesia techniques with subarachnoid morphine.

详细描述

National and international guidelines, hospital protocols, the anesthesiologist's experience, and the patient's decision play a role in selecting the technique used for postoperative analgesia after cesarean section. The quality of recovery score experienced following elective cesarean section in a total of 180 patients over one year (December 31, 2021-2022) who applied subarachnoid morphine, lateral TAP block, posterior-TAP block, QL block, ESP block, and TFD block (30 patients for each technique) will be evaluated with the ObsQoR-10 questionnaire 24 hours after delivery. The regional anesthesia techniques information applied to the patients will be obtained from the patient file. Researchers will not perform any interventional procedure, and any randomization will not be applied. After the data collection process for the study is completed, ObsQoR-10 will be compared statistically. The secondary aims of this study are to compare the cases in terms of postoperative analgesia and antiemetic requirements, first food intake and standing up without support, and patient satisfaction.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 47 Years(Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Term obstetric patients aged 18-47 years who underwent elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia and applied regional anesthesia techniques such as lateral TAP, posterior-TAP, QL, ESP, and TFD blocks or subarachnoid morphine.

排除标准

  • Patients with psychiatric disorders
  • Patients requiring emergency cesarean section.
  • Patients with additional obstetric pathology (such as placenta previa, preeclampsia, DM)
  • The need for intensive care in the mother or newborn at the end of the birth.
  • Patients who have undergone general anesthesia.
  • Preterm pregnants

结局指标

主要结局

Obstetric Quality of Recovery

时间窗: The first 24 hours postoperatively

Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 (ObsQoR-10©) Scoring Tool

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Betul Kozanhan

Ass.Prof.

Konya Meram State Hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验