跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03892382
NCT03892382撤回不适用

A Pilot Study of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Improvement of Apathy in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Jagiellonian University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家开始时间: 2019年11月15日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
撤回
发起方
试验地点
2
主要终点
Apathy Evaluation Scale Clinical Version after rTMS, total score, range 18 to 72 with higher values representing a worse outcome

研究概览

简要总结

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by progressive loss of central and peripheral motor neurons. ALS leads to death usually within 3 to 5 years from the onset of the symptoms. Available treatment can prolong the disease duration but cannot modify the disease course. Apathy is a frequent complication of ALS, affecting up to 30% of patients and affecting negatively the survival. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive method of modulation of brain plasticity with confirmed beneficial effect on apathy in several neurologic and psychiatric conditions. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of rTMS in improving the apathy in patients with ALS with placebo stimulation.

详细描述

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by progressive loss of central and peripheral motor neurons. ALS leads to death usually within 3 to 5 years from the onset of the symptoms. Available treatment can prolong the disease duration but cannot modify the disease course. Apathy is a frequent complication of ALS, which negatively influences quality of life (caga et al. 2018) and is an independent poor prognostic factor for survival (Caga et al. 2016). Similarly, the depression is also a frequent complication of ALS. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive method of modulation of brain plasticity with confirmed beneficial effect on apathy in several neurologic and psychiatric conditions like mild cognitive impairment (Padala et al. 2018), stroke (Sasaki et al. 2017), Alzheimer disease (Nguyen et al. 2017) and schizophrenia (Prikryl et al. 2013). The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of rTMS in improving the apathy in patients with ALS with placebo stimulation and - as a secondary outcome - depression in patients with ALS.

Intervention will include ten daily sessions of rTMS. In each session 3000 magnetic pulses will be administered over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Stimulation intensity will equal 120% of the motor threshold value for the right first dorsal interosseus.

Assessment of apathy and of depression and daily functioning will be made before and after therapy, as well as two and four weeks later.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

Sham stimulation will be provided by holding the stimulating coil perpendicularly to the scalp, which assures similar impression as during active stimulation but prevents significant magnetic field to reach the brain tissue.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 80 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Diagnosis of definite or probable ALS according to el Escorial criteria (Brooks et al. 2000)
  • Moderate or severe depression defined as the score in Beck's Depression Inventory ≥20
  • Mini-Mental State Examination score ≥26

排除标准

  • Psychiatric symptoms, which may negatively influence patient's tolerance and adherence to therapy
  • Respiratory insufficiency and other complications od advanced stages of ALS, which may compromise patient's ability to undergo the study procedure
  • Contraindications for rTMS as listed by the Guidelines of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (Rossi et al. 2009) i.e. seizure in the past, epilepsy, presence of magnetic material in the reach of magnetic field, pregnancy, likelihood to get pregnant, intracranial electrodes, cardiac pacemaker or intracardiac lines, frequent syncopes

结局指标

主要结局

Apathy Evaluation Scale Clinical Version after rTMS, total score, range 18 to 72 with higher values representing a worse outcome

时间窗: Baseline rTMS, directly (on the same 1 day) after finishing rTMS

Change from baseline score in Apathy Evaluation Scale Clinical Version to the measurement taken directly after finishing rTMS.

Apathy Evaluation Scale Clinical Version first follow up, total score, range 18 to 72 with higher values representing a worse outcome

时间窗: Baseline rTMS, two weeks after finishing rTMS

Change from baseline score in Apathy Evaluation Scale Clinical Version to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.

Apathy Evaluation Scale Clinical Version second follow up, total score, range 18 to 72 with higher values representing a worse outcome

时间窗: Baseline rTMS, four weeks after finishing rTMS

Change from baseline score in Apathy Evaluation Scale Clinical Version to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS

次要结局

  • Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised after rTMS, total score, range 0 to 40 with higher values representing a better outcome(Baseline rTMS, directly (on the same 1 day) after finishing rTMS)
  • Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised first follow up, total score, range 0 to 40 with higher values representing a better outcome(Baseline rTMS, two weeks after finishing rTMS)
  • Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised second follow up, total score, range 0 to 40 with higher values representing a better outcome(Baseline rTMS, four weeks after finishing rTMS)
  • Beck's Depression Inventory ater rTMS, total score, range 0 to 63, with higher values representing a worse outcome(Baseline rTMS, directly (on the same 1 day) after finishing rTMS)
  • Beck's Depression Inventory first follow up, total score, range 0 to 63, with higher values representing a worse outcome(Baseline rTMS, two weeks after finishing rTMS)
  • Beck's Depression Inventory second follow up, total score, range 0 to 63, with higher values representing a worse outcome(Baseline rTMS, four weeks after finishing rTMS)

研究者

发起方
Jagiellonian University
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Jakub Antczak

Principal Investigator

Jagiellonian University

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验