跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06539325
NCT06539325招募中不适用

Rapid Molecular Diagnosis and Detection of Emerging Infectious Diseases in Patients With Tropical Fever

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 564 人开始时间: 2024年8月26日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
564
试验地点
2
主要终点
Number of Patient informed of a microbiologically confirmed infection and of the appropriate course of action within five days after the initial visit to the emergency department.

研究概览

简要总结

Travellers returning from tropical countries often present to emergency departments with acute fever. While systematic screening for malaria is well established in clinical practice in France, further diagnostic testing for infectious diseases is less codified. In addition, the clinical presentation of many tropical and emerging infectious diseases is often similar, making a positive diagnosis in these patients challenging.

Improving the microbiological diagnostic strategy for febrile travellers is crucial because the lack of an accurate diagnosis in many of these patients prevents the implementation of appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic measures. These measures include antimicrobial treatment, but also additional investigations, specialised monitoring and the initiation of follow-up of acute or chronic infections.

In addition, the current diagnostic approach to tropical fevers is poorly suited to detect outbreaks associated with a new or re-emerging infectious disease and to alert public health authorities in a timely manner.

Therefore, this project aims to evaluate the impact of a systematic and expanded microbiological diagnostic strategy for patients presenting to the emergency department with fever after returning from tropical countries. To evaluate this testing strategy, the investigators propose to conduct a multicentre, cluster-randomised, cross-over trial comparing standard care with a systematic microbiological diagnostic algorithm added to standard care.

详细描述

Frequently, travelers returning from tropical countries seek medical advice in the emergency department (ED) for acute fever. While the systematic search for malaria is well anchored in clinical practice in France, further diagnostic testing for infectious diseases (ID) is less codified. Besides, the clinical presentation of many tropical and emerging infectious pathologies (EID) is often similar, presenting challenges for a positive diagnosis in those patients.

Indeed, besides testing for malaria all patients with fever and a travel history in tropical regions in the last 3 months, there are, to our knowledge, no French guidelines on the diagnosis strategy of fever in the returning traveler. A few studies have proposed a syndromic testing strategy for patients admitted to ICU, but literature still lacks data on the efficiency of syndromic testing strategies in patients without severity criteria consulting at the ED. Other expert committees and literature on the topic usually recommend to collect a detailed clinical history including nature of travel, relevant activities and exposure, and physical findings, and then prescribe laboratory tests according to each situation. However, this common-sense clinical approach may not be adapted to the peculiar situation of emergency departments where the expertise of clinicians in infectious and tropical diseases may vary and time constraints do not always allow clinicians to collect a detailed history and examination. Moreover, even a careful medical history and physical examination may mislead clinicians in case of atypical clinical presentations or unexpected infections.

A recent study conducted in Spain, Switzerland and Belgium has shown that among travelers with acute undifferentiated febrile illnesses, 132/455 (29.0%) had viral infections, including 108/455 (23.7%) arboviruses, 96/455 (21.1%) malaria and 82/455 (18.0%) bacterial infections. A review of travel-related infections in 103,739 patients consulting in different European clinics between 1998 and 2018 reported an increase in arboviral infections over the last decade, with dengue, chikungunya and zika virus infections being almost as frequent as malaria between 2013 and 2018. A similar percentage of patients presented a viral syndrome with or without rash, in which the etiological agent could not be identified, emphasizing the gaps in our current testing strategy.

The diagnosis of respiratory viruses, including SARS-CoV-2, influenza, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), is often overlooked in returning travelers consulting in the emergency department (ED), despite being transmitted either year-long in tropical countries or during the rainy season, concomitantly with malaria. Rickettsial diseases, such as spotted fever or scrub typhus for example, represented 2% of febrile returning travelers in a recent article but are exceptionally sought after in the diagnostic process of patients consulting in the emergency department. Some of these patients with rickettsial diseases had no characteristic eschar. Likewise hemorrhagic fevers and, particularly Lassa fever, whose prevalence has been increasing in recent years in Nigeria are seldomly tested.

It is thus an open question whether a broader and more systematic microbiological laboratory testing strategy could enhance the number of diagnosis and thus the management of patients in this population. Indeed, improving our diagnostic strategy is crucial because the lack of a precise diagnosis in many of these patients prevents the implementation of appropriate diagnostic therapeutic measures. These measures obviously include antimicrobial treatments, but also additional investigations, specialized monitoring, and the initiation of a follow-up of acute or chronic infections. Indeed, the visit in the ED of those febrile travelers represents a unique opportunity to screen for chronic viral infections (such as HIV, hepatitis B and C), as well as acute hepatitis due to HAV or HEV, as this population of travelers is particularly at risk.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
Single (Investigator)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 99 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Adult (age ≥ 18 years old)
  • Fever (tympanic temperature above 38°c measured in the emergency department)
  • Within 28 days of returning from tropical countries (Sub-Saharan Africa, South and Southeast Asia, Central and South America)
  • No sepsis (qSOFA < 2)

排除标准

  • Patient requiring hospitalization
  • Patient unable to consent: unconscious or language barrier without an available translator
  • Patient under legal protection measure (guardianship, curatorship, legal protection, deprivation of liberty, hospitalisation for psychiatric care)
  • Patient refusing to participate

结局指标

主要结局

Number of Patient informed of a microbiologically confirmed infection and of the appropriate course of action within five days after the initial visit to the emergency department.

时间窗: 5 days

Number of Patient informed of a microbiologically confirmed infection and of the appropriate course of action within five days after the initial visit to the emergency department.

次要结局

  • Number of Hospitalizations linked to the diagnosis, according to the physician in charge, in the 3 months following inclusion(3 months)
  • Total cost of compliance with the diagnostic workup(3 months)
  • Number of Patient with a microbiologically confirmed diagnosis within 5 days after ED visit.(5days)
  • Number of Lost to follow up patient: a patient will be considered lost to follow up if no contact has been established to informed him of the result of the diagnostic tests within 5 days after ED visit (neither by phone nor during a hospital visit).(3 months)
  • Mortality at 3 months following ED visit, mortality linked to the diagnosis according to the investigator or the physician in charge of the patient at 3 months following ED visit(3 months)
  • Total Cost of the strategy of infectious disease management(3 months)
  • Diagnostic performances of the Dragonfly panel compared to reference PCR panel: sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values will be calculated(3 months)
  • Length of hospitalizations linked to the diagnosis, according to the physician in charge, in the 3 months following inclusion(3 months)
  • Diagnostic performance of the new set of primers integrated into the Dragonfly panel compared to the PCR developed by the French and international reference centers (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value)(3 months)
  • Number of hospitalizations and linked mortality at 3months(3 months)
  • Number of death at 3 months(3 months)
  • Number of the specific management of patients(3 months)
  • Delay (number of days) in the addition of a new set of primers in the Dragonfly panel(3 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验