Integrated Prevention of HIV Risk and Intimate Partner Violence Among Adolescents in South Africa
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 60
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Number of Participants With Satisfaction With Intervention Content
研究概览
简要总结
The purpose of this study is to test the feasibility and acceptability of Safe South Africa, an integrated intervention for preventing HIV and Intimate Partner Violence perpetration for male adolescents 15-17 years of age.
详细描述
This study will investigate the acceptability and feasibility of Safe South Africa, an integrated intervention to prevent adolescent behavioral risk for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and perpetration of intimate partner violence (IPV). Safe South Africa is a theory-driven, developmentally-tailored and gender-specific intervention designed for male adolescents 15-17 years of age. The research will be conducted in South Africa, a country with the largest HIV epidemic and some of the highest rates of IPV perpetration in the world. Preventive interventions are urgently needed during adolescence when risk for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and intimate partner violence (IPV) increases exponentially. Yet, few behavioral interventions integrate HIV-IPV prevention and are tailored for the unique age and developmental needs of adolescents. We will investigate the acceptability and feasibility of Safe South Africa with three study aims: (1) a development aim - this aim will result in the creation of Safe South Africa, an integrated male adolescent preventive intervention for HIV risk behavior and IPV perpetration; (2) an acceptability aim - this aim will consist of an evaluation of the social ecology of HIV and IPV risk with a survey of N=100 of adolescents, and a test of the acceptability of Safe South Africa through an open pilot trial with N=20 male adolescents; and (3) a feasibility aim - this aim will consist of a randomized controlled pilot trial with 1- and 6-month follow-up in a sample of N=60 male adolescents to assess the feasibility and acceptability for a future fully powered randomized controlled trial to evaluate efficacy of the intervention.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Prevention
- 盲法
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
盲法说明
Single Blind
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 15 Years 至 17 Years（Child）
- 性别
- Male
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Male adolescent
- •15-17 years of age, inclusive of 15 and 17
排除标准
- •parent/guardian does not provide consent
- •adolescent does not provide assent
结局指标
主要结局
Number of Participants With Satisfaction With Intervention Content
时间窗: 6 months
Satisfaction with intervention content is based off of a measure called the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire developed by Larsen DL, Attkisson CC, Hargreaves WA, Nguyen TD. Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: Development of a general scale. Evaluation and Program Planning. 1979;2:197-207. We focus on the question from that scale that assesses satisfaction with the program. The item asks, "How satisfied are you with the program you have received?" Participants could rank their satisfaction from: 1 = quite dissatisfied, 2 = mildly dissatisfied, 3 = mostly satisfied, 4 = very satisfied." Higher scores correspond with higher satisfaction with the intervention program.
Intervention Feasibility
时间窗: 6 months
Feasibility is measured by ability to recruit the planned number of participants into the trial. We wanted to recruit at least 95% of the target number of planned participants. Feasibility is also measured by retention of trial participants at the final timepoint. A cut off of 75% retention of all participants enrolled in the trial at the final timepoint is viewed as a good result for feasibility.
Intervention Fidelity
时间窗: From the start of the intervention delivery period to the end of the delivery period - a 2 month timespan in total.
Fidelity was not based off a published measure. Rather, a neutral observer rated the facilitator's delivery skills and adherence to a manualized protocol for delivering the intervention that guided the consistent delivery of core theoretical components of the intervention. This neutral observer used the following rankings on a scale with rankings ranging from 1 (equating to a category labeled as low demonstration of skills, \<25% of the time) to 3 (equating to a category labeled as high demonstration of skills, \>75% of the time). An average ranking of 2.5 or more is seen as success for fidelity.
次要结局
- Number of Participants Who Refused Sex at 6 Months(6 months)
- Number of Participants Engaging in Intimate Partner Violence at 6 Months(6 months)
- Change From Baseline in Likelihood of Bystander Intervention Behavior(6 months)
研究者
Caroline Kuo
Assistant Professor
Brown University