跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01354535
NCT01354535Unknown不适用

Isolated Locked Compression Plating Versus Cable Plating and Strut Allografts With Cerclage Wiring for Vancouver B1 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Unity Health Toronto2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 89 人开始时间: 2013年2月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
89
试验地点
2
主要终点
TUG test score at 6 weeks post-op

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to compare two different but standard treatments for the fixation of Vancouver B1 periprosthetic. The investigators aim to compare open reduction internal fixation using a locked plating system versus plating and strut allograft with cerclage wiring to determine which treatment results in a faster return to function as measured by the TUG test at 6 weeks post-op.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 90 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age: over 18, no upper limit
  • Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic fracture
  • Fracture is amenable to either treatment group
  • Prosthesis is well fixed
  • Provision of informed consent

排除标准

  • Presence of an active infection around the fracture (soft tissue or bone)
  • Loose prosthesis
  • Trauma patients with an ISS > 16 or associated major injuries of the lower extremities
  • Known substance abuse
  • Likely problems, in the judgment of the investigators, with maintaining follow-up (i.e., patients with no fixed address, report a plan to move out of town, or intellectually challenged patients without adequate family support)

结局指标

主要结局

TUG test score at 6 weeks post-op

时间窗: 6 weeks

We will administer the TUG test to each patient at 6 weeks to determine if there is a difference in functional status between both groups.

次要结局

  • Re-operation rates(1 year)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验