A Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscopy and Macintosh Laryngoscopy for Routine Nasotracheal Intubation
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 70
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- time to intubation
研究概览
简要总结
McGrath videolaryngoscopy avoids the use of Magill forceps for nasotracheal intubation, thereby reducing intubation time and complications, especially in patients with a difficult airway. This study was performed to investigate whether McGrath videolaryngoscopy is superior to Macintosh laryngoscopy for routine nasotracheal intubation in expected normal airways, as judged by the time to intubation and ease of intubation.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 盲法
- Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 20 Years 至 60 Years（Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •patients for dental or maxillofacial surgery requiring nasotracheal intubation
排除标准
- •known difficult airway
- •required rapid sequence induction
- •history of bleeding
- •cervical spine injury
研究组 & 干预措施
McGrath
Nasotracheal intubation was performed with McGrath videolaryngoscopy
干预措施: Macintosh laryngoscopy (Device)
Macintosh
Nasotracheal intubation was performed with Macintosh direct laryngoscopy
干预措施: McGrath videolaryngoscopy (Device)
结局指标
主要结局
time to intubation
时间窗: 4 min after anesthetic induction
time the nasotracheal tube was inserted into nares until endtidal CO2 was detected
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Jong Yeop Kim
Associate professor
Ajou University School of Medicine