ACTRN12611000233921尚未招募未知
High-flow nasal cannulae versus ambient oxygen for the treatment of newborn infants with early respiratory distress in non-tertiary special care nurseries – A multicentre randomised controlled trial
niversity of Newcastle0 个研究点目标入组 520 人开始时间: 2011年3月3日最近更新:
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 未知
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 520
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomised controlled trial
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Open (masking not used)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 1 Hours 至 24 Hours(—)
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Diagnosed with respiratory distress. Defined as at least one of the following: intercostal/subcostal recession, audible ‘grunt’, or tachypnoea (respiratory rate >60/min).
- •2. Who require any supplemental inspired oxygen to maintain peripheral oxygen saturation (Sp02) of 90-95% for a period of more than one hour.
- •3. Aged less than 24 hours.
排除标准
- •1. Gestational age at birth less than 32 completed weeks. The trial will continue to support and encourage the NHMRC recommendations for in utero transfer of infants expected to be born at less than 33weeks gestation. Furthermore, no change in practice will be made for those centres that routinely transfer in utero at gestational ages higher than 33 weeks. It is not uncommon, however, for babies of this gestation to be unavoidably born at a non-tertiary nursery.
- •2. Birth weight lower than that which the SCN would normally care for.
- •3. Apgar score less than or equal to 3 at 5 minutes of age (used as an arbitrary and de-facto indicator of possible perinatal asphyxia).
- •4. Any infant who is perceived by their paediatrician to need NICU care, or who has a known major congenital abnormality requiring care in a tertiary centre, or which may impact upon the infant’s condition after birth (eg. congenital cardiac disease, upper airway obstruction, gastrointestinal malformations).
研究者
相似试验
尚未招募
不适用
Comparison of the effects on blood oxygen level between two delivery of oxygen methods during long endoscopic proceduresACTRN12620000931976Austin Health300
招募中
不适用
High-flow nasal cannula versus standard oxygen therapy assisting sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in high risk cases: A randomised multicentre trialAnaesthesiaendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyAirway managementOral and Gastrointestinal - Other diseases of the mouth, teeth, oesophagus, digestive system including liver and colonRespiratory - Normal development and function of the respiratory systemAnaesthesiology - AnaestheticsACTRN12619000397112The Queen Elizabeth Hopsital Anaesthesia Department132
已完成
4 期
High flow nasal cannula versus conventional oxygen therapy in children with respiratory distressInfants and children with respiratory distressHFNC,Conventional oxygen therapy,respiratory distressTCTR20170222007Rachada Pisek Sompotch177
已完成
不适用
High-flow nasal oxygen cannula versus conventional oxygen therapy in patients with acute dyspnea and hypoxemia in emergency roomPatients presenting with acute dyspnea and hypoxemia in an emergency roomDyspneaEmergency roomOxygen therapyHypoxemiaTCTR20140618002Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital40
尚未招募
不适用
Comparing oxygenation between two techniques in patients, after extubation from general anaesthesia 1.High flow nasal cannula 2.venturi maskCTRI/2020/07/026482ABVIMS and Dr RML Hospital
