跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05565053
NCT05565053已完成不适用

Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block for Myofascial Pain Syndrome

Istanbul University2 个研究点 分布在 2 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2021年7月25日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
60
试验地点
2
主要终点
Comparison of the effectiveness of the two interventions (trigger point injection versus Erector spinae plane block) assessed by Visual analog scale (VAS):

研究概览

简要总结

The investigators aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of bilateral erector spina plane block application in myofascial pain syndrome.

详细描述

The investigators aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of bilateral erector spina plane block application in myofascial pain syndrome by comparing trigger point injection. Group 1 received erector spinae plane block, and group 2 received trigger point injection both administered in two weekly sessions. Before the application, one week after application and one month after application the investigators aimed to compare pressure pain threshold with algometer, visual analog scale score, neck disability index score, for the two groups. Each group has 30 participants, total 60 participants included this study. The investigators planned to show that bilateral erector spinae plane block can be used as an effective and safe method in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome, since it is easier to apply than other invasive procedures used in the treatment and has a very low complication profile.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Screening
盲法
Single (Participant)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Get a myofascial pain syndrome diagnosis
  • No invasive procedure for myofascial pain syndrome in the last 1 month
  • Signing the informed consent form

排除标准

  • Cervical disc herniation
  • Neck/shoulder, thoracal trauma or operation history
  • Malignancy
  • Kyphoscoliosis
  • Inflammatory diseases (Rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis...)
  • Congenital vertebral anomalies
  • Pregnancy
  • Mental, psychogenic disorder
  • Hematological diseases that cause bleeding and coagulation disorders
  • Use of antiplatelet, anticoagulant and drugs that cause bleeding tendency
  • Severe systemic infection such as sepsis and local infection at the intervention site
  • Having an allergy to any of the drugs to be used

研究组 & 干预措施

Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block

Active Comparator

Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block

干预措施: Bilateral thoracal erector spinae plane block (Procedure)

Trigger Point Injection

Active Comparator

Trapezius muscle Trigger Point Injection

干预措施: Trapezius muscle trigger point injection (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

Comparison of the effectiveness of the two interventions (trigger point injection versus Erector spinae plane block) assessed by Visual analog scale (VAS):

时间窗: 1. month

The classic interventional treatment of myofascial back pain is trigger point injection. In addition, erector spina plan block has been applied in recent years as an interventional procedure that provides analgesia in the same region and is thought to have a long duration of action. Visual analog scale (VAS): Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-100. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Halil Cetingok

Ass. Prof

Istanbul University

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验