Comparison of Proximal Contact Tightness of Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Versus Conventional Nanohybrid Resin Composite: a Randomized Clinical Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 进行中(未招募)
- 入组人数
- 52
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Contact Tightness
研究概览
简要总结
To achieve an optimal contact area is essential to avoid tooth migration, food impaction, and the occurrence of secondary caries. However, proximal restorations constitute challenge for the professional and tight contact points are difficult to obtain depending not only on tools used, but also on type of restorative material. Current tooth-colored restorative materials are not condensable and there is shrinkage with setting. The aim of this study is to compare the proximal contact tightness of zirconia reinforced glass ionomer versus conventional nanohybrid resin composite when used in class II cavities.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Participant)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 19 Years 至 35 Years(Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- 未提供
排除标准
- 未提供
结局指标
主要结局
Contact Tightness
时间窗: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 1 year
Measuring the adequacy of proximal contact restoration using intervention \' zirconomer\" versus control which is Nanohybrid resin composite. Heaviness of this contact using Modified USPHS criteria. USPHS criteria are standardized in which a dental floss is used. Contact tightness can have one of three scores: Alpha Bravo Charlie
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Alaa Fathi Abdelsalam
Principal in investigator
Cairo University
