跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07626190
NCT07626190已完成不适用

Comparison of Six Strand and Four Strand Techniques on the Repair of Injured Flexor Tendons of Zone II of the Hand

Allied Hospital Faisalabad1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 136 人开始时间: 2026年1月27日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
136
试验地点
1

研究概览

简要总结

Flexor tendon injuries in Zone 2 of the hand remain challenging because of the need to achieve optimal tendon healing while allowing early mobilization and minimizing complications such as rupture and adhesions. Various tendon repair techniques have been described, including four-strand and six-strand core suture methods.

This study aims to compare the functional outcomes and complication rates between four-strand and six-strand flexor tendon repair techniques in patients with Zone 2 flexor tendon injuries.

详细描述

Flexor tendon injuries of Zone 2 are among the most difficult hand injuries to manage because of the complex anatomy and the tendency for adhesion formation and tendon rupture. Advances in tendon repair techniques have focused on increasing repair strength to permit early active mobilization while maintaining tendon gliding.

Four-strand repair techniques have been widely used and provide acceptable tensile strength and clinical outcomes. However, six-strand repair techniques may provide greater biomechanical stability and potentially allow safer early mobilization with lower rupture rates. Despite these theoretical advantages, there remains ongoing debate regarding the superiority of one technique over the other in terms of functional recovery and complication profile.

This prospective comparative study will be conducted in patients presenting with acute Zone 2 flexor tendon injuries of the hand. Eligible patients will undergo tendon repair using either four-strand or six-strand core suture techniques according to study allocation. All patients will follow a standardized postoperative rehabilitation protocol.

Primary outcomes will include functional assessment using total active motion and tendon rupture rates.

The findings of this study may help determine the optimal repair technique for improving functional outcomes in Zone 2 flexor tendon injuries while minimizing complications.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 50 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Male or female participants.
  • Age 18 to 50 years.
  • Zone II flexor tendon injury of the hand.
  • Presentation within one week of injury.
  • Willingness to participate and provide informed consent.
  • Ability to comply with the postoperative rehabilitation protocol.

排除标准

  • Injuries that interfere with postoperative rehabilitation.
  • Extensive soft tissue damage associated with the tendon injury.
  • Previous tendon injury in the same digit or hand region.
  • Previous surgery in the same affected area.
  • Non-compliance or anticipated inability to comply with the postoperative rehabilitation protocol.
  • Evidence of a psychological or personality disorder that may affect participation or outcome assessment.
  • Systemic illness that may compromise wound or tendon healing (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, connective tissue disorders, severe vascular disease).

研究者

发起方
Allied Hospital Faisalabad
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Muhammad Behram Abbas

Post Graduate Resident, Department of Plastic Surgery

Allied Hospital Faisalabad

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验