跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00972634
NCT00972634已完成不适用

The European Palliative Care Research Collaborative - Computerised Symptom Assessment and Classification of Pain, Depression and Physical Function (Cachexia) (EPCRC - CSA)

Norwegian University of Science and Technology1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 1,051 人开始时间: 2008年10月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
1,051
试验地点
1
主要终点
Validity of domains and items for depression

研究概览

简要总结

RATIONALE: A computer-based system for assessing symptoms may be effective for patients with metastatic or advanced cancer.

PURPOSE: This clinical trial is studying how well computerized questionnaires work in assessing symptoms, pain, depression, and physical function in patients with metastatic and/or advanced local/regional cancer.

详细描述

OBJECTIVES:

  • Determine the feasibility of applying a computer-based system for symptom assessment and classification in palliative cancer care in patients with metastatic and/or advanced cancer.
  • Examine hypothesized differences across groups related to acceptance of computers (i.e., age, culture, stage of disease, cognitive and physical function, etc.).
  • Examine the general user-friendliness of the tool.
  • Test and validate the performance of selected domains and items for classification and assessment of pain and cachexia.
  • Explore the validity of domains and items for depression.

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study.

All patients undergo computer-based assessments of general symptoms by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ C30) questionnaires and assessment of physical function, appetite/weight loss, and depression by the Brief Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PRIME-MD PHQ9). Patients who score ≥ 1 (on a 0-10 numerical rating score) on the pain screening question with or without occurrence of breakthrough pain (BTP), undergo the Alberta BTP Assessment tool assessing precipitating factors for pain, time to pain relief after intake of medication, and satisfaction with medication. Patients complete questions regarding user-friendliness and feasibility of using the computer at the end of their session.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Cross Sectional

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Validity of domains and items for depression

时间窗: Sept 2008-December 2009

Feasibility of applying a computer based system for symptom assessment and classification in palliative cancer care

时间窗: Sept 2008-December 2009

Differences across groups related to acceptance of computers (i.e., age, culture, stage of disease, cognitive and physical function, etc.)

时间窗: Sept 2008-December 2009

General user-friendliness of the tool

时间窗: Sept 2008-December 2009

Performance of selected domains and items for classification and assessment of pain and cachexia

时间窗: Sept 2008-December 2009

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验