跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03230773
NCT03230773撤回不适用

Can Untrained Bystanders Safely and Effectively Use an Automated External Defibrillator (AED) in a Cardiac Arrest Scenario?

University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust0 个研究点开始时间: 2020年4月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
撤回
主要终点
Time from arrival at patient side to discharging a defibrillation shock

研究概览

简要总结

Survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is time critical and diminishes rapidly without appropriate intervention. Bystander CPR at least doubles the chances of survival and the additional use of a public access defibrillator (PAD) can again double overall survival rates. PADs are designed to be easy and simple to use, but whether untrained bystanders can use them safely and effectively is unknown. This study will aim to assess the ability of untrained bystanders to deploy a PAD in a simulated cardiac arrest.

详细描述

Survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is time critical and diminishes rapidly without appropriate intervention. Overall survival is no more than 10% in the UK.

Bystander CPR at least doubles the chances of survival and the additional use of a public access defibrillator (PAD) can again double overall survival rates. Because PADs can make such a dramatic increase in chances of survival, public health programmes have encouraged the deployment of PADs in areas of high public density in order to deliver early defibrillation prior to ambulance arrival. Where this can be achieved, survival rates as high as 50% have been reported.

PADs are designed to be easy and simple to use, and in addition to graphical instructions on the device, give verbal instructions to a rescuer in order to ensure the PAD is used correctly. Most bystanders who are first on scene at a cardiac arrest have no first aid training and it is not always possible to wait for someone with first aid training to be available to use a PAD. Several guidelines, such as those from the Resuscitation Council (UK), state that untrained bystanders can use a PAD, but there has been little evaluation to understand whether this can safely and effectively be achieved without specific PAD training.

This study will aim to assess the ability of untrained bystanders to safely and effectively deploy a PAD in a simulated cardiac arrest, specifically aiming to identify differences between the features of different devices that improve their ease of use in order to understand what design features are required for optimal design.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
16 Years 至 —(Child, Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Members of the public who have never received any first aid (CPR) training

排除标准

  • Those less than 16 yrs age
  • Those with any physical disability precluding the use of a PAD

结局指标

主要结局

Time from arrival at patient side to discharging a defibrillation shock

时间窗: Within the 5 mins of the simulated cardiac arrest.

Comparison of median time taken to achieve this endpoint for each type of defibrillator

次要结局

  • Time from arrival at patient side to correct application of self-adhesive defibrillation pads(Within the 5 mins of the simulated cardiac arrest.)
  • Following of written and verbal instructions to ensure safe use of device(Within the 5 mins of the simulated cardiac arrest.)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Charles D. Deakin

Professor of Resuscitation

University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust

相似试验