Ultra-Brief Versus Brief Hands Only CPR Video Training With and Without Psychomotor Skill Practice
- Conditions
- Cardiac Arrest
- Registration Number
- NCT01191736
- Lead Sponsor
- Valleywise Health
- Brief Summary
Bystander CPR improves survival from Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest. This study examines the efficacy of ultra-brief video training for Hands-Only CPR. Subjects were randomized to one of four training conditions, then assessed for CPR skills retention.
- Detailed Description
Bystander CPR improves survival from Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest. This study is the first of its kind to examine the efficacy of ultra-brief video training for Hands-Only CPR without the use of a manikin. The results will inform future efforts to mass train citizens in CPR. Subjects were randomized to one of four training conditions, then assessed for CPR skills retention. The four groups were 1) no training; 2) ultra-brief training video (90 seconds); 3) short training video (5 minutes) with no practice; and 4) short training video with hands-on practice. The subjects were then evaluated for CPR skills retention. One half of the subjects were evaluated on the training day, and the other half were evaluated two months later.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 336
- Members of a local area church
- Less than 18 years old
- formal CPR training or certification within last 2 years
- Lacks fluency in English
- Works as a health care provider
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Median Compression Depth (mm) 60 minutes after intervention or two months after intervention Assessment of resuscitation skills using a Laerdal Resusci Annie recording manikin and Laerdal PC Skill Reporting software
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The Proportion of Subjects Who Assessed the Responsiveness of the Victim (Manikin) as Judged by Expert Raters 60 minutes after intervention and two months after intervention The proportion of the subjects who assessed the responsiveness of the victim (manikin) as judged by expert raters