跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04728867
NCT04728867Unknown不适用

Comparison of Textbook Versus 3D Animation Versus Cadaveric Training Video in Teaching Laparoscopic Rectal Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial From Tertiary Care Center

Ankara University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 120 人开始时间: 2020年6月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
120
试验地点
1
主要终点
Comparison of rectal cancer assessment scores among the groups before and after the education

研究概览

简要总结

Digital 3D animation and cadaveric videos have been increasingly used in surgical education and provide tremendous opportunity to develop new surgical educational tools, particularly during this Coronavirus-19 pandemic period.

This prospective, randomized, blinded study is designed to compare the educational effectiveness of various educational tools including the surgical textbook, animation, and cadaveric videos in laparoscopic rectal surgery among board-certificated surgeons. Initially, an electronic questionnaire assessing the knowledge about laparoscopic rectal surgery will be created and validated by the board-certificated colorectal surgeons. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses will be utilized to test the structure validity of the questionnaire. After the questionnaire will be sent to the graduates completing the general surgery residency program in Turkey, the volunteers will be then randomized into four groups based on the study material including a textbook, 3D animation, cadaveric video, and both 3D animation + cadaveric video. A step-by-step educational 3D animation and a cadaveric video will be prepared in order to teach the technical steps of laparoscopic rectal surgery. Volunteers in four groups were given 2 weeks to review their educational material. After the 2-weeks of the study period, the volunteers will be asked to answers the same electronic questionnaire imported in the edited live laparoscopic rectal surgery. Pre- and post-educational assessment of the questionnaire among the groups will be performed and compared.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Factorial
主要目的
Health Services Research
盲法
Single (Participant)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • General surgeon who graduated at least 5 years ago from the residency
  • General surgeon who is proficient to perform open rectal surgery
  • General surgeon who was scrubbed in/assisted for laparoscopic rectal surgery
  • General surgeon who is not able to perform laparoscopic rectal surgery by itself

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Comparison of rectal cancer assessment scores among the groups before and after the education

时间窗: 3 months

Rectal cancer questionnaire that assesses the knowledge about laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. We are expecting to see improved post-educational scores (higher than 20- mean value) (rectal cancer educational questionnaire) compared to the pre-educational scores. Higher than 20 is improved and better outcomes Range: 15-25

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Mehmet Ayhan Kuzu

Prof. Dr.

Ankara University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Comparison of Textbook Versus 3D Animation Versus... | 临床试验