跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07147322
NCT07147322招募中不适用

The Effect of Basic Life Support Training in a Virtual Environment on Perceived Stress and Measured Stress Responses Compared to Conventional Basic Life Support Training

Oulu University Hospital2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2025年8月13日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
60
试验地点
2
主要终点
Stress and Workload Compared Between Two Basic Life Support Training Environments

研究概览

简要总结

This medical education study investigates stress levels among undergraduate medical students during basic life support (BLS) training. It compares traditional face-to-face teaching session with virtual reality (VR) training simulating a resuscitation scenario in a public place. We will measure heart rate, heart rate variability, and self-reported stress to assess acute stress responses. The study also examines physical sensations related to VR, the realism of the virtual environment, and the suitability of VR for BLS training.

详细描述

Cardiac arrest is a major cause of mortality, with survival depending heavily on timely and effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Basic life support (BLS) training teaches recognition of cardiac arrest, calling for help, providing chest compressions and ventilations, and using an automated external defibrillator (AED). For healthcare students, regular BLS training is essential but often limited by time, resources, and staff availability. Simulation-based training provides safe practice opportunities, but traditional methods can be resource-intensive.

Virtual reality (VR) offers an alternative, enabling immersive, interactive training with lower resource requirements. VR can simulate realistic resuscitation scenarios in varied environments, potentially increasing engagement, situational awareness, and learning outcomes. However, VR may also induce physical symptoms such as nausea or dizziness, and its effectiveness compared with conventional training remains under investigation.

This pilot study compares conventional face-to-face BLS training with VR-based training delivered via head-mounted displays simulating a public cardiac arrest. The primary objective is to evaluate stress responses between the two methods, measured physiologically by heart rate variability (HRV) and psychologically by validated stress and workload questionnaires. Secondary objectives are to assess VR-related physical symptoms, the perceived realism and usability of the VR environment, and its suitability as a BLS teaching method.

The VR environment replicates a public setting with bystanders and distractions. Compressions are performed on a manikin mapped to a virtual patient, with real-time feedback on depth and rate. A virtual AED is integrated into the simulation.

Sixty first- or second-year medical students will be randomized to VR-based or conventional manikin-based BLS training (30 per group). Exclusion criteria include pregnancy, prior healthcare experience, and BLS training within the past six months. Previous VR experience will be recorded.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 30 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Volunteers (18-30 years old) will be recruited from first- and second-year medical students
  • Participants must be healthy young individuals with no known heart disease, normal physical performance capacity, and no current physical limitations that would affect the ability to perform chest compressions.

排除标准

  • Pregnant individuals will not be included
  • Individuals with previous healthcare experience will not be included.
  • Participants must not have received basic life support training within the past six months.

结局指标

主要结局

Stress and Workload Compared Between Two Basic Life Support Training Environments

时间窗: During training session (approximately 2 hours, including pre/post questionnaires)

To determine whether basic life support training in a virtual environment causes more stress and workload than conventional training. Stress will be measured using heart rate variability (HRV), and perceived mental workload will be assessed with validated questionnaires (STAI, NASA-TLX).

Physiological Stress (Heart Rate Variability, HRV)

时间窗: During training session (approximately 2 hours/participant)

Physiological Stress (Heart Rate Variability, HRV). Continuous three-lead ECG recording using skin-surface electrodes with the Bittium Faros 180 device. Parameters: Standard HRV indices (time-domain: SDNN, RMSSD; frequency domain: LF, HF, LF/HF ratio). Interpretation: Lower HRV (e.g. higher LF/HF ratio) indicates greater physiological stress.

Stress (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, STAI) questionary

时间窗: Immediately after training

Description: Stress levels assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Range: 20-80. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater situational anxiety/stress.

Perceived Workload (NASA Task Load Index)

时间窗: Immediately after training

Questionnaire assessing workload across six dimensions (mental, physical, temporal demand, performance, effort, frustration). Range: 0-100. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater perceived workload.

次要结局

  • Simulation Design Quality (Simulation Design Scale, SDS)(Immediately after training)
  • Evaluation of physical symptoms caused by virtual environment - Simulation Sickness (Simulation Sickness Questionnaire, SSQ)(Immediately after training)
  • Suitability of virtual environment for Basic life support training - System Usability (System Usability Scale, SUS)(Immediately after training)
  • Sense of Presence (Slater-Usoh-Steed Questionnaire)(Immediately after training)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Pasi Lehto

Medical doctor, Clinical lecturer

Oulu University Hospital

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验