跳至主要内容
临床试验/ChiCTR1900026870
ChiCTR1900026870已完成Unknown

Comparison of Wide Awake Local Anesthesia with No Tourniquet versus Regional and General Anesthesia in The Management of Distal Radius Fractures

未提供1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 169 人开始时间: 2016年3月3日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
Unknown
状态
已完成
入组人数
169
试验地点
1
主要终点
Patient Reported Outcomes

研究概览

简要总结

We hypothesized that WALANT for distal radius fractures is cost-effective, easy to use, safe, and has a high patient satisfaction rate as compared to the current practices of anaesthesia (general anaesthesia and Bier's block). Furthermore, we hypothesized that WALANT is a reproducible technique and does not require a high set of skills. To test these hypotheses, we compared various perioperative parameters, clinical outcome, and costs of general anaesthesia, Bier’s block, and WALANT techniques in a prospective cohort study.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
主要目的
随机抽样
盲法
Double

入排标准

年龄范围
18 至 80(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Participants included were patients with a unilateral closed fracture of the distal radius, that presented to our hospital within ten days of the initial injury

排除标准

  • consisted of open fractures of the distal radius, bilateral distal radius fractures, and polytrauma patients requiring general anaesthesia or spinal anaesthesia for other injuries, such as long bone fractures, and traumatic brain injuries. In addition, patients that were anxious, non-cooperative, and those that did not consent to surgery were also excluded from the study protocol. Furthermore, patients with peripheral vascular disease, bleeding tendency, abnormal clotting profile, hypersensitivity to lidocaine, or active infection in the body were excluded from the study.

研究组 & 干预措施

1

WALANT

2

GA

3

Bier's block

结局指标

主要结局

Patient Reported Outcomes

时间窗: 1 year

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
未提供

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Comparison of Wide Awake Local Anesthesia with No... | 临床试验